Benchmark: jQuery 223 vs 351

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.3/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq223 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq351 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({
      "background-color": "green"
    })).end().end().remove();
  console.log('tests' + $);
}

Tests:

JQ223
tests($jq223);
JQ351
tests($jq351);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JQ223
JQ351

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; RMX1921) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/86.0.4240.198 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 86 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
JQ223	8957.3 Ops/sec
JQ351	8042.1 Ops/sec

jQuery 223 vs 351 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: JQ223 vs JQ351

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JQ223

JQ351

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A