Benchmark: Ramda forEachObjIndexed vs Native Object.values + Array.map

HTML Preparation code:

<html>
<head>
  <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js'></script>
</head>
<body></body>
</html>

Script Preparation code:

window.testData = {}

for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
	window.testData['key' + i] = i
}

Tests:

Ramda (while loop inside)
R.forEachObjIndexed((value, key) => console.log(value), window.testData)
Native ES5 Object.values + Array.map
Object.values(window.testData).map(value => console.log(value))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda (while loop inside)
Native ES5 Object.values + Array.map

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/119.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 119 on Windows

Test name	Executions per second
Ramda (while loop inside)	15.8 Ops/sec
Native ES5 Object.values + Array.map	15.2 Ops/sec

Ramda forEachObjIndexed vs Native Object.values + Array.map (version: 0)