Benchmark: bind vs inline func

Script Preparation code:

var bind = (fn, ...args1)=> (...args2)=> fn(...args1, ...args2);

var foo_ = (a, b)=> a * b;

var foo1 = (a)=> (b)=> a*b;

var foo2 = (a)=> foo_.bind(undefined, a);

var foo3 = (a)=> bind(foo_, a)

Tests:

inline func
for(var i=0; i!==100; i++) { const ni = foo1(Math.random()); ni(Math.random()); }
bind func
for(var i=0; i!==100; i++) { const ni = foo2(Math.random()); ni(Math.random()); }
custom bind
for(var i=0; i!==100; i++) { const ni = foo3(Math.random()); ni(Math.random()); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
inline func
bind func
custom bind

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.27 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 87 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
inline func	30512.5 Ops/sec
bind func	17612.0 Ops/sec
custom bind	18441.5 Ops/sec

bind vs inline func (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: inline func vs bind func vs custom bind

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

inline func

bind func

custom bind

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A