const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const finalObject = {
firstObject,
{ moreData: 'foo bar' }
};
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const finalObject = {
firstObject,
moreData: 'foo bar',
};
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | |
Using single item addition. | |
using object assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | 2352355.0 Ops/sec |
Using single item addition. | 2312239.8 Ops/sec |
using object assign | 6520425.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the provided benchmark data.
The main purpose of this benchmark is to compare three different approaches for creating objects with merged data in JavaScript:
...
): This syntax allows you to merge two objects by spreading their properties and values into a new object.+=
or +=
operators.Object.assign()
: This method returns a new object with the properties of the source objects merged.Now, let's break down the pros and cons of each approach:
Spread operator: Pros:
Cons:
Single item addition: Pros:
Cons:
Object assign: Pros:
Cons:
It's worth noting that the benchmark results show significant differences between these approaches, with the spread operator being the fastest. However, the actual performance impact may vary depending on the specific use case and JavaScript engine.
As for libraries or special features in this benchmark, there are no notable ones mentioned in the provided data. The focus is solely on comparing different JavaScript syntaxes for object merging.
Other alternatives to these approaches might include:
Object.assign()
or spread operator.Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to the spread operator, single item addition, and object assign approaches.