Benchmark: equality objects functions

Tests:

equality by gettingDifferences
const equalArrays = (arr1, arr2) => arr1.length === arr2.length && arr1.every((element, index) => getDifferences(element, arr2[index]) === undefined) function getDifferences(original, modified) { if (original instanceof Array && modified instanceof Array) { return equalArrays(original, modified) ? undefined : modified } if (original instanceof Object && modified instanceof Object) { let result = {} for (const key of Object.keys(modified)) { const diff = getDifferences(original[key], modified[key]) if (diff !== undefined) { result[key] = diff } } return !Object.keys(result).length ? undefined : result } return original === modified ? undefined : modified } const objA = { a: 1, b: 2, c: { d: 3, e: [4, { h: 5 }] }, f: [6, 7], g: 8 } const objB = { a: 1, b: 2, c: { d: 3, e: [4, { h: 4 }] // field h changed }, f: [6, 7], g: 8 } const arrA = [objA, objB] const arrB = [objA, objA] console.log(equalArrays(arrA, arrA)) console.log(equalArrays(arrA, arrB))
equality by recursion
const deepEqual = (thing1, thing2) => { if (thing1 instanceof Object && thing2 instanceof Object) return Object.keys(thing1).every(key => deepEqual(thing1[key], thing2[key])) return thing1 === thing2 } const objA = { a: 1, b: 2, c: { d: 3, e: [4, { h: 5 }] }, f: [6, 7], g: 8 } const objB = { a: 1, b: 2, c: { d: 3, e: [4, { h: 4 }] // field h changed }, f: [6, 7], g: 8 } const arrA = [objA, objB] const arrB = [objA, objA] console.log(deepEqual(arrA, arrA)) console.log(deepEqual(arrA, arrB))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
equality by gettingDifferences
equality by recursion

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

The provided JSON represents two test cases for JavaScript microbenchmarking on MeasureThat.net. Both tests aim to measure how efficiently browsers can compare equality between two objects or arrays.

**Test Case 1: "equality by gettingDifferences"**

This test uses a custom function `getDifferences` to compare the elements of two arrays or objects. The function recursively checks for differences between corresponding elements, using a similar approach as JSON diffing algorithms. If all elements are equal, it returns an empty object (`{}`). Otherwise, it returns the modified array or object.

The test creates two sets of objects: `arrA` and `arrB`. `arrA` consists of two identical objects with nested structures, while `arrB` has a single object with the same structure but with a changed field `h`.

**Test Case 2: "equality by recursion"**

This test uses a simpler function `deepEqual` to compare two objects. It checks if both objects have the same keys and recursively calls itself for each key-value pair.

Both tests use the same input sets, `arrA` and `arrB`, and log the results to the console using `console.log`.

**Library/Function Purpose**

In Test Case 1, the `getDifferences` function is a custom implementation of a JSON diffing algorithm. It's used to recursively compare objects or arrays and returns an empty object if they're identical.

In Test Case 2, the `deepEqual` function is a simple recursive function that checks for equality between two objects by verifying that both have the same keys and values.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

1. **getDifferences (JSON diffing)**:
	* Pros: Can handle nested structures with different data types.
	* Cons: Can be slower due to the complexity of the recursive algorithm.
2. **deepEqual (recursive function)**:
	* Pros: Simple, straightforward implementation, and relatively fast.
	* Cons: May not perform well for large or deeply nested objects.

**Other Considerations**

* The tests only compare equality between identical objects or arrays with minimal changes (e.g., a single field changed).
* The use of custom functions (`getDifferences` and `deepEqual`) introduces some overhead compared to built-in comparison operators.
* The benchmark measures the number of executions per second, which can be influenced by various factors such as CPU, memory, and JavaScript engine optimizations.

**Alternatives**

Other approaches for comparing equality between objects or arrays include:

1. Using the built-in `JSON.stringify()` method with custom rejections (e.g., `JSON.stringify(obj) === JSON.stringify(otherObj)`).
2. Utilizing libraries like Lodash's `isEqual` function.
3. Implementing a custom comparison function using a library like Underscore.js.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might have varying performance characteristics and may not be as efficient as the custom implementations used in the benchmark tests.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/82.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 82 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
equality by gettingDifferences	7233.0 Ops/sec
equality by recursion	7396.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

equality objects functions (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: equality by gettingDifferences vs equality by recursion

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

equality by gettingDifferences

equality by recursion

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):