Benchmark: jQuery class selector

jQuery class selector (version: 0)

This will test the difference between selecting an element using its class vs getting a handle on the parent element and then navigating to the child.

Comparing performance of: Id and class chaining selector vs Class selector only vs Id selector then .find vs Class selector using parent element vs parentEl with .find vs Class selector using parentEl

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<div id='curBody1'>
  <div>
    <span>
      <div>
        This is a div we're NOT looking for.
      </div>
    </span>
  </div>
</div>
<div id='curBody2'>
  <div>
    <span>
      <div class='desired-element'>
        This is the div we're looking for.
      </div>
    </span>
  </div>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

var curElement = null;
var parentEl = $("#curBody2"); //Used for last two test cases only.

Tests:

Id and class chaining selector
curElement = $('#curBody2 .desired-element');
Class selector only
curElement = $('.desired-element');
Id selector then .find
curElement = $('#curBody2').find('.desired-element');
Class selector using parent element
curElement = $('.desired-element',$('#curBody2'));
parentEl with .find
curElement = parentEl.find('.desired-element');
Class selector using parentEl
curElement = $('.desired-element',parentEl);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Id and class chaining selector
Class selector only
Id selector then .find
Class selector using parent element
parentEl with .find
Class selector using parentEl

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_6) AppleWebKit/603.3.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/10.1.2 Safari/603.3.8

Browser/OS: Safari 10 on Mac OS X 10.12.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Id and class chaining selector	323155.2 Ops/sec
Class selector only	570200.0 Ops/sec
Id selector then .find	439855.9 Ops/sec
Class selector using parent element	395986.1 Ops/sec
parentEl with .find	791879.7 Ops/sec
Class selector using parentEl	551895.9 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between three ways to select an element using jQuery:

1. **Direct Class Selector**: `$('.desired-element')`
2. **Id and Class Chaining**: `$('#curBody2 .desired-element')`
3. **Id then `.find`**: `$('#curBody2').find('.desired-element')`

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of these three methods, which involve different levels of DOM traversal:

* Direct Class Selector: only traverses the class selector and returns the desired element.
* Id and Class Chaining: first finds an element by its ID, then uses a class selector to find the desired child element.
* Id then `.find` : first finds an element by its ID, then uses the `.find()` method to search for the desired child element.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

1. **Direct Class Selector**:
	* Pros: fast and efficient, as it only traverses a single level of elements.
	* Cons: may not be compatible with older browsers that don't support class selectors, and may not work well if the desired element is deeply nested.
2. **Id and Class Chaining**:
	* Pros: flexible and can handle complex selects, but may be slower due to the extra step of finding an ID first.
	* Cons: slower than direct class selector, as it involves two DOM traversal steps.
3. **Id then `.find`**:
	* Pros: fast and efficient, as it uses a single `.find()` method to search for the desired element.
	* Cons: may not work well if the desired element is not found within the first set of results, and can be slower than direct class selector in some cases.

**Other considerations**

* The benchmark also includes tests with and without a parent element (`parentEl`), which affects the performance of the `.find()` method.
* Some browsers (e.g., Safari) have optimized performance for certain selectors, such as class selectors or IDs, so results may vary depending on the browser being used.

**Alternative approaches**

Other ways to select elements using jQuery include:

* Using `$('#curBody2 .desired-element')` with a different selector (e.g., `.class-selector`)
* Using `$('*').filter()`, which can be slower and less efficient than direct class selectors or IDs.
* Using other DOM traversal methods, such as `$(document).ready()` or `$('body').find()`

Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on the specific use case and requirements of your project.

Related benchmarks:

jQuery class selector (version: 0)

This will test the difference between selecting an element using its class vs getting a handle on the parent element and then navigating to the child.

Comparing performance of: Id and class chaining selector vs Class selector only vs Id selector then .find vs Class selector using parent element vs parentEl with .find vs Class selector using parentEl

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Id and class chaining selector

Class selector only

Id selector then .find

Class selector using parent element

parentEl with .find

Class selector using parentEl

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):