Run results for: CloneNode vs InnerHTML

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 107

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
CloneNode	55.4 Ops/sec
InnerHTML	25.5 Ops/sec

Tests:

CloneNode
const row = '<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>'; const table = '<table><tbody>' + Array(10000).fill(row) + '</tbody></table>'; const template = document.createElement('template'); template.innerHTML = table; const div = document.createElement('div'); template.content.firstChild.cloneNode(true);
InnerHTML
const row = '<tr><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>'; const table = '<table><tbody>' + Array(10000).fill(row) + '</tbody></table>'; const template = document.createElement('template'); template.innerHTML = table; const div = document.createElement('div'); div.innerHTML = table;