Run results for: TEST match vs exec on safari

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.45 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 96

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 3 years ago

Tests:

regex full
/^((['])((?:\\.|[^'])+?)(')|(['])(.*)(')|(["])((?:\\.|[^"])+?)(")|([`])((?:\\.|[^`])+?)(`))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`")
regex part (WORST CASE)
/^((['])((?:\\.|[^'])+?)('))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`"); /^((['])(.*)('))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`"); /^((["])((?:\\.|[^"])+?)("))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`"); /^(([`])((?:\\.|[^`])+?)(`))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`");
regex part (BEST CASE)
const r = /^(([`])((?:\\.|[^`])+?)(`))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`"); if(r) { return; } /^((['])((?:\\.|[^'])+?)('))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`"); /^((['])(.*)('))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`"); /^((["])((?:\\.|[^"])+?)("))/.exec("`SELECT (1);`");
Match
"`SELECT (1);`".match(/^(([`])((?:\\.|[^`])+?)(`))/)