Run results for: set.has vs. array.includes xd

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.66 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 87

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 3 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
array -> includes	5619059.0 Ops/sec
set -> has	1156807.1 Ops/sec

Tests:

array -> includes
var a = ["TEST_1", "TEST_2", "TEST_3", "TEST_4", "TEST_5", "TEST_6", "TEST_7", "TEST_8", "TEST_9", "TEST_10"]; return a.includes("TEST_9") && a.includes("TEST_8") && a.includes("TEST_7") && a.includes("TEST_6") && a.includes("TEST_5") && a.includes("TEST_4") && a.includes("TEST_3");
set -> has
var a = ["TEST_1", "TEST_2", "TEST_3", "TEST_4", "TEST_5", "TEST_6", "TEST_7", "TEST_8", "TEST_9", "TEST_10"]; var b = new Set(a) return b.has("TEST_9") && b.has("TEST_8") && b.has("TEST_7") && b.has("TEST_6") && b.has("TEST_5") && b.has("TEST_4") && b.has("TEST_3");