MeasureThat.net

Run results for: convert to set + set.has vs. array.includes

Check if it is faster to convert an array to a set and perform set.has(), compared to performing array.includes() on the base array.

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/82.0
Firefox 82
Mac OS X 10.15
Desktop
3 years ago
Test name Executions per second
includes 47879240.0 Ops/sec
convert to set 1287489.9 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • includes

  • convert to set

;