<div id='curBody1'>
<div>
<span>
<div>
This is a div we're NOT looking for.
</div>
</span>
</div>
</div>
<div id='curBody2'>
<div>
<span>
<div class='desired-element'>
This is the div we're looking for.
</div>
</span>
</div>
</div>
var curElement = null;
curElement = $('#curBody2 .desired-element');
curElement = $('.desired-element');
curElement = $('#curBody2').find('.desired-element');
curElement = $('.desired-element',$('#curBody2'));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Id and class chaining selector | |
Class selector only | |
Id selector then .find | |
Class selector using parent element |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Id and class chaining selector | 101175.7 Ops/sec |
Class selector only | 530380.3 Ops/sec |
Id selector then .find | 394325.8 Ops/sec |
Class selector using parent element | 350893.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmarking scenario.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The benchmark is designed to test the performance of different approaches when selecting an element using its class versus getting a handle on the parent element and then navigating to the child.
Options Compared
There are four options compared:
#
) and a class selector (.
) in a single query..
).#
) followed by the .find()
method to find the child element with the specified class.Pros and Cons
Library Usage
The jQuery
library is used in all benchmark cases. Specifically:
$('#curBody2 .desired-element')
: Uses an ID selector followed by a class selector (.$
) to select the desired element.$('.desired-element')
: Uses a class selector alone to select the desired element.$('#curBody2').find('.desired-element')
: Uses an ID selector followed by the .find()
method to find the child element with the specified class.$('.desired-element,$('#curBody2'))
: Uses a class selector followed by a parent selector (.$
) to select the desired element.Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no explicit mention of special JavaScript features or syntax in the benchmark definition. However, the use of jQuery
and its methods (e.g., .find()
, .$()
) assumes that the test environment has jQuery installed.
Other Alternatives
If the test were to be run without using jQuery, alternative approaches might include:
document.querySelector()
or document.getElementById()
):has()
or >
)Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely require significant modifications to the benchmark definition and implementation.