var arrays = ['date1', 'date2', 'date3', 'date4', 'date5', 'date6', 'date7', 'date8', 'date9', 'date10', 'date11', 'date12', 'date13', 'date14', 'date15'],
fullDates= 'date1date2date3date4date5date6date7date8date9date10date11date12date13date14date15',
i =0,
j = arrays.lenght,
isThere = false,
val = 'date8';
isThere = fullDates.indexOf(val) >= 0;
isThere = fullDates.match(val);
for(i; i < j; i++) {
if(arrays[i] === val) {
isThere = true;
breake;
}
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
indexOf | |
Match | |
For |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
indexOf | 2881000.0 Ops/sec |
Match | 2042591.0 Ops/sec |
For | 12001660.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of three different approaches to find a specific string within an array:
indexOf
(using the built-in JavaScript method)Match
(using the String.prototype.match()
method)For
(using a traditional loop)Options Compared
The three options are compared in terms of their execution time, measured in executions per second.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
indexOf
.indexOf
Library Used
In this benchmark, no libraries are used beyond the built-in JavaScript methods.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's considered standard in modern JavaScript (ES6+).
Other Considerations
When choosing an approach, consider the specific requirements of your application:
indexOf
is likely the best choice.Match
might be suitable. However, this approach can be slower and less efficient than indexOf
.For
loop might be a better option.Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches or optimizing these test cases further:
indexOf
, you could consider using Array.prototype.indexOf()
instead of the built-in method.Match
, you could explore other regular expression methods, such as String.prototype.search()
.For
, you could optimize the loop by using early termination conditions (e.g., checking if val
is already found) or caching intermediate results.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches are relatively small for small arrays. However, for larger datasets, one of these methods will be significantly faster than the others.