Benchmark: Path2d vs drawImage(svg)

HTML Preparation code:

<image id="svg1"
src=""
></image>
<canvas id="cnv1" width=1216 height=769></canvas>

Script Preparation code:

var ctx = document.getElementById("cnv1").getContext("2d");
var svgImg = document.getElementById("svg1");
var z = new Path2D("M539.01268 400c6.65049 0 11.81248 7.97321 19 9c29.83558 4.26223 69 -3.45722 69 -38 M536.01268 333c0 -31.29974 -70.64882 -5.39684 -57 31c22.54786 60.12763 80.70984 -0.29016 60 -21 M584.01268 318c0 -26.33841 88.76022 -84.59663 93 -21c2.90208 43.53122 -84 66.60075 -84 30 M731.01268 259c-16.87215 -16.87215 -53.59764 -11.49773 -75 -11c-55.18164 1.28329 -202.02765 23.77698 -213 94c-14.00896 89.65736 130.05062 100.67089 186 77c68.7278 -29.07715 41.10353 -66.54494 70 -107c9.46005 -13.24407 18.43498 -27.90832 33 -36c6.28752 -3.49307 14.78413 -1.78413 20 -7");
var z2 = new Path2D("M539.01268 400c6.65049 0 11.81248 7.97321 19 9c29.83558 4.26223 69 -3.45722 69 -38 M536.01268 333c0 -31.29974 -70.64882 -5.39684 -57 31c22.54786 60.12763 80.70984 -0.29016 60 -21 M584.01268 318c0 -26.33841 88.76022 -84.59663 93 -21c2.90208 43.53122 -84 66.60075 -84 30");

Tests:

drawImage()
ctx.drawImage(svgImg,0,0);
Path2D
ctx.fill(z); ctx.fill(z2); ctx.stroke(z);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
drawImage()
Path2D

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 130 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
drawImage()	57809.1 Ops/sec
Path2D	96126.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Path2d vs drawImage(svg) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: drawImage() vs Path2D

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

drawImage()

Path2D

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):