Benchmark: getElementByClassName vs querySelector 1

HTML Preparation code:

<div class="testElement"></div>

Tests:

getElementById
var el = document.getElementsByClassName('testElement'); var className = el.className;
querySelector
var el = document.querySelector('.testElement'); var className = el.className;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
getElementById
querySelector

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its options.

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches to retrieve an element by class name: `document.getElementsByClassName` (implemented as `getElementById`) and `document.querySelector`.

**Options being compared:**

1.  `document.getElementsByClassName`: This function returns a HTMLCollection object containing all elements with the specified class name. It's a legacy method introduced in early versions of JavaScript.
2.  `document.querySelector`: This function returns the first element that matches the provided CSS selector.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

*   **`document.getElementsByClassName`**: 
    *   **Pros:** Wide compatibility across browsers, even older ones (pre-Internet Explorer 8). However, it may be slower than newer methods.
    *   **Cons:** Returns all elements with the specified class name, which can lead to performance issues if there are many such elements. It also returns the index of each element within the collection, not just its value.
*   `document.querySelector`: 
    *   **Pros:** More selective and efficient way to get a single element by class name, using CSS selectors. This method is often preferred in modern web development for its simplicity and flexibility. However, it may not work across older browsers (pre-Internet Explorer 9).
    **Cons**: May be slower than `getElementsByClassName` on some browsers.

The benchmark runs multiple executions of each approach to determine which one performs better.

**Library usage:**

Neither `document.getElementsByClassName` nor `document.querySelector` uses a library explicitly, as they are part of the HTML and JavaScript APIs.

**Special JS features or syntax:**

There is no mention of any special JavaScript features or syntax in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two basic methods for retrieving elements by class name.

**Alternatives:**

If you need more selective or efficient ways to retrieve elements, consider using:

*   `document.querySelectorAll`: A cousin of `querySelector`, which returns a NodeList containing all matches.
*   Modern JavaScript APIs like `Element.prototype.closest` (for getting the closest ancestor) or `Element.prototype.matches` (for matching CSS selectors).

**Additional considerations:**

When choosing between these methods, keep in mind:

*   **Browser support**: Newer browsers tend to support more modern methods. If you need to target older browsers, stick with legacy methods like `getElementsByClassName`.
*   **Performance**: For complex or slow queries, consider optimizing your CSS selectors or using a library that provides better performance.

In the context of this benchmark, both approaches are tested on Safari 13 (Desktop) and compared in terms of performance.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_4) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/13.1.1 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 13 on Mac OS X 10.15.4

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
getElementById	6557815.5 Ops/sec
querySelector	5918104.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

getElementByClassName vs querySelector 1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: getElementById vs querySelector

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

getElementById

querySelector

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):