Benchmark: Javascript if condition < 0

Tests:

If !~ operator
let i = 1; return !~i;
If < 0 operator
let i = 1; return i < 0;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
If !~ operator
If < 0 operator

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark data and explain what's being tested, compared, and some pros and cons of different approaches.

**Benchmark Definition**
The provided Benchmark Definition json represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests the performance of two specific operators: `!~` (bitwise NOT operator) and `< 0` (less than zero). The benchmark is designed to measure which one is more efficient in terms of executions per second.

**Options Compared**

There are only two options being compared:

1. **`!~` operator**: This operator performs a bitwise NOT operation on the value `i`, effectively converting it to its binary representation and flipping all bits.
2. **`< 0` operator**: This operator checks if the value `i` is less than zero.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

* For the `!~` operator:
	+ Pros: Fast and efficient, as it only requires a single operation to convert the value to its binary representation.
	+ Cons: May not be suitable for all use cases, as it performs a bitwise NOT operation, which can affect bit-level operations.
* For the `< 0` operator:
	+ Pros: Simple and easy to understand, as it checks if the value is less than zero directly.
	+ Cons: May be slower than the `!~` operator due to the additional comparison.

**Library Used**
There doesn't appear to be any specific library being used in this benchmark. The script preparation code is empty, suggesting that no external libraries are required to run this benchmark.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**
None mentioned. This benchmark only uses basic JavaScript operators and syntax.

**Other Alternatives**

If you wanted to create a similar benchmark for the `!~` operator using a different approach, you could consider:

* Using bitwise shift operators (`>>>` or `<<`) instead of `!~`
* Implementing the `!~` operator manually using bitwise operations
* Comparing the performance of different JavaScript engines (e.g., V8, SpiderMonkey) with this benchmark

Keep in mind that creating a similar benchmark would require modifying the script preparation code to accommodate the new approach.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**
Since there is no script preparation code provided for the Benchmark Definition json, it's likely that the author intended for users to provide their own JavaScript code for testing.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/75.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 75 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
If !~ operator	1170708608.0 Ops/sec
If < 0 operator	1186111360.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Javascript if condition < 0 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: If !~ operator vs If < 0 operator

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

If !~ operator

If < 0 operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):