Benchmark: Array loop vs foreach vs map with id compare in objects renan

Script Preparation code:

var idToGet = ''	

function uuidv4() {
  return 'xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx'.replace(/[xy]/g, function(c) {
    var r = Math.random() * 16 | 0, v = c == 'x' ? r : (r & 0x3 | 0x8);
    return v.toString(16);
  });
}

var arr = [];
    for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
      arr[i] = {id: uuidv4(), idx: i};
    }

	var item = arr[Math.floor(Math.random() * arr.length)];
	
	idToGet = item.id
  
    function someFn(i) {
      return i.id === idToGet
    }

Tests:

foreach
arr.forEach(function (item){ someFn(item); })
for
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) { someFn(arr[i]); }
map
arr.map(item => someFn(item))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
foreach
for
map

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into explaining the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The test compares three approaches to iterate through an array of objects in JavaScript: `forEach`, `for` loops, and `map` with a callback function.

**Options Compared**

1. **`forEach`**: This method iterates through an array using a closure (a self-executing anonymous function) that is called for each element in the array.
2. **`for` Loops**: This traditional approach uses a manual loop counter to iterate through the array, where each iteration checks if the current index is within the bounds of the array.
3. **`map` with callback function**: The `map` method creates a new array by applying a provided callback function (in this case, `someFn`) to each element in the original array.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **`forEach`**:
	* Pros: concise syntax, easy to read, and maintain.
	* Cons: can be less efficient due to the overhead of creating an iterator object and handling the loop termination condition.
2. **`for` Loops**:
	* Pros: straightforward, predictable performance, and no memory allocation for iterators.
	* Cons: verbose syntax, more prone to errors (e.g., off-by-one mistakes), and less readable compared to `forEach`.
3. **`map` with callback function**:
	* Pros: concise syntax, easy to read, and maintain.
	* Cons: creates a new array, which can lead to memory allocation overhead, especially for large datasets.

**Library and Special JS Features**

In this benchmark, the following library is used:

1. **UUID (Universally Unique Identifier)**: The `uuidv4()` function generates a random UUID string, which is assigned as the unique identifier (`idToGet`) in each array element. This suggests that the benchmark is testing the performance of different iteration methods with distinct data structures.

**Other Considerations**

* The test case uses a simple array of objects, where each object has an `id` property and an `idx` property.
* The `someFn` function is used as the callback function for both `forEach` and `map`, which means that it's being executed in parallel for each element. This could impact performance due to function call overhead.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative iteration methods or optimizing your code, consider the following options:

1. **`for...of` loops**: Introduced in ECMAScript 2017, this syntax provides a more modern and concise way of iterating through arrays.
2. **`while` loops**: A traditional approach for manual loop iterations, which can be useful when dealing with complex logic or edge cases.
3. **`reduce()` method**: Instead of using `map` to create a new array, consider using the `reduce()` method to accumulate results in a single array.

Please note that these alternatives might not be directly comparable to the original `forEach`, `for`, and `map` approaches, as they have different use cases and performance characteristics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 YaBrowser/23.3.3.709 Yowser/2.5 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Yandex Browser 23 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
foreach	11844.7 Ops/sec
for	7690.5 Ops/sec
map	11458.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array loop vs foreach vs map with id compare in objects renan (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: foreach vs for vs map

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

foreach

for

map

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):