var arr1 = Array(100).fill([{n: ''}]);
var arr2 = Array(100).fill([{n: ''}]);
Array.prototype.push.apply(arr1, arr2)
arr1.push(arr2)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push.apply | |
Array.prototype.push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push.apply | 431465.6 Ops/sec |
Array.prototype.push | 25858.3 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test for comparing the performance of two approaches to add elements to an array: Array.prototype.push.apply
and Array.prototype.push
.
Options Compared
Array.prototype.push.apply(arr1, arr2)
: This method applies an array to push
. In this case, it uses the spread operator (arr2
) as the array to be applied.arr1.push(...arr2)
: This method uses the spread operator (...arr2
) to unpack the elements of arr2
and add them one by one to arr1
.Pros and Cons
Array.prototype.push.apply(arr1, arr2)
:push
.arr1.push(...arr2)
: Array.prototype.push.apply
.Library and Purpose
In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that the use of modern JavaScript features like spread operators (...
) is often dependent on library support or implementation-specific behavior.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark uses the spread operator (...
) to unpack elements from an array into a new array. This syntax was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and has been widely adopted since then.
Other Alternatives
Alternative approaches could include:
Array.prototype.concat()
instead of spread operators.Array.from()
and pushing elements to it, then assigning the result back to arr1
._.unionBy
or _.merge
to concatenate arrays.These alternatives would change the fundamental approach to adding elements to an array and might not be as efficient or readable as the original methods.