a = [];
for(var i=0;i<100;i++){
a.push({index:i,data:"blabla"});
}
var indexToFind = 50;
ind = -1;
for(var i =0;i<a.length;i++){
if(a[i].index == indexToFind){
ind = i;
}
}
a[ind].data;
a.find(x => x.index == indexToFind).data;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for loop | |
javascript array.find |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for loop | 22599.4 Ops/sec |
javascript array.find | 182327.7 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The provided JSON defines a benchmark for searching an object array by property using two different approaches: for
loop and javascript array.find
. The script preparation code creates an array a
with 100 objects, each containing an index
property. The indexToFind
variable is set to 50.
Approaches Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches:
for
loop is used to iterate through the array and find the object with the matching index.find()
method is used to search for the first element in the array that satisfies a given condition.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Other Considerations
When choosing between these approaches, consider the following:
for
loop might be a safer choice.javascript array.find
approach is generally more concise and readable, but this may come at the cost of performance in certain cases.Library
The benchmark uses the built-in JavaScript Array.prototype.find()
method, which searches for an element that satisfies a provided condition. This library is widely supported by most modern browsers and provides a convenient way to perform array searching.
Special JS Feature
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark beyond the use of the find()
method, which is a standard part of the ECMAScript specification since ECMAScript 2015 (ES6).
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider:
forEach()
, some()
, or other array methods to search for elements.Keep in mind that each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements, target audience, and performance considerations.