Benchmark: twe1awe45as32d1aw6d45

Script Preparation code:

replaceParams = [
    {
      "id_campania": "26757",
      "tipo_campania": "MIXTA",
      "tipo_documento": "E",
      "cedula": "915",
      "contrato": "8058",
      "Telefono": "573162515999",
      "email": "jramirez@masivian.com",
      "Nombre": "Jaiber Ramirez",
      "Valor": "$ 5.122.987",
      "Dias": "733",
      "Originador": "BANCOLOMBIA",
      "Cartera": "REINTEGRA",
      "Remitente": "omarin@masivian.com",
      "Parametros": "https://www.micovinoc.com?utm_source=digital&utm_medium=token&utm_campaign=MiCovinoc_20191029",
      "Url": "https://www.micovinoc.com",
      "Plantilla": "<h1> HOLA {{Nombre}} </h1>",
      "Asunto": "este es un {{contrato}} email de prueba {{Nombre}}} este es tu telefono {{Telefono}}"
    }
  ]
string = "este es un {{contrato}} email de prueba {{Nombre}}} este es tu telefono {{Telefono}}"

Tests:

test1
if (!string || !replaceParams) { throw Error('invalid data'); } let replaced = string; while (replaced.includes('{{SHORTURL}}')) replaced = replaced.replace('{{SHORTURL}}', ' SHORTURL .'); while (replaced.includes('{{') && replaced.includes('}}')) { let key = ''; if (replaced.lastIndexOf('{{') < replaced.lastIndexOf('}}')) { key = replaced.substring(replaced.lastIndexOf('{{') + 2, replaced.lastIndexOf('}}')); } else { key = replaced.substring(replaced.indexOf('{{') + 2, replaced.lastIndexOf('}}')); } if (key.includes('}')) key = key.substring(0, key.indexOf('}')); const value = replaceParams[key]; const replaceString = new RegExp(`{{${key}}}`, 'g'); // eslint-disable-next-line max-len replaced = replaced.replace(replaceString, value); while (replaced.includes(`{{${value}}}`)) { replaced = replaced.replace(`{{${value}}}`, value); } }
Test2
if (!string || !replaceParams) { throw Error('invalid data'); } let replaced = string; while (replaced.includes('{{SHORTURL}}')) replaced = replaced.replace('{{SHORTURL}}', ' SHORTURL .'); while (replaced.includes('{{') && replaced.includes('}}')) { let key = ''; if (replaced.lastIndexOf('{{') < replaced.lastIndexOf('}}')) { key = replaced.substring(replaced.lastIndexOf('{{') + 2, replaced.lastIndexOf('}}')); } else { key = replaced.substring(replaced.indexOf('{{') + 2, replaced.lastIndexOf('}}')); } if (key.includes('}')) key = key.substring(0, key.indexOf('}')); const value = replaceParams[key]; const replaceString = new RegExp(`{{${key}}}`, 'g'); if (!value) replaced = replaced.replace(replaceString, key); else replaced = replaced.replace(replaceString, value); }
double while
if (!string || !replaceParams) { throw Error('invalid data'); } let replaced = string; Object.keys(replaceParams).forEach((key) => { const value = replaceParams[key]; const replaceString = new RegExp(`{{${key}}}`, 'g'); replaced = replaced.replace(replaceString, value); }); replaced = replaced.replace('{{SHORTURL}}', ' SHORTURL .');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
test1
Test2
double while

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

To explain what is tested on the provided JSON that represents the benchmark, I'll break it down into smaller parts.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JavaScript code snippet that contains the logic for generating a string by replacing placeholders in a template string with actual values. The template string uses a syntax like `{{KEY}}` to indicate a placeholder, where KEY is a key from an object called `replaceParams`.

**Options Compared**

Three different approaches are compared:

1. **Direct Replacement**: The code snippet uses a direct replacement approach, where it iterates over the `replaceParams` object and replaces each placeholder with its corresponding value using the syntax `{{KEY}}`. This approach is straightforward but might be slower due to the number of iterations.
2. **Regular Expressions**: The second approach uses regular expressions to replace the placeholders. It creates a RegExp object for each key in `replaceParams` and uses the `g` flag to replace all occurrences of the placeholder with its value. This approach can be faster than direct replacement, especially if there are many replacements.
3. **Object Iteration**: The third approach iterates over the `replaceParams` object using `Object.keys()` and replaces each placeholder with its value using regular expressions.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Direct Replacement**:
	+ Pros: Simple to understand, easy to implement
	+ Cons: Might be slower due to the number of iterations
* **Regular Expressions**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster than direct replacement, especially if there are many replacements
	+ Cons: Requires a deeper understanding of regular expressions, can be more complex to implement
* **Object Iteration**:
	+ Pros: Simple and efficient, uses built-in object iteration methods
	+ Cons: Might not be as performant as regular expressions for large datasets

**Library Usage**

The code snippet does not use any external libraries besides JavaScript's built-in `RegExp` class.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There is no special JS feature or syntax used in this benchmark definition. It only uses standard JavaScript features like loops, objects, and regular expressions.

**Other Alternatives**

If you wanted to optimize the benchmarking process, here are some other alternatives:

* Use a more efficient data structure for `replaceParams`, such as a Map or a Trie, if the dataset is large.
* Implement caching for frequent replacements, so that the same values can be reused instead of recomputed.
* Consider using a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler like SpiderMonkey or V8 to optimize the JavaScript engine.
* Use parallel processing techniques to execute multiple iterations of the benchmark simultaneously.

Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:72.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/72.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 72 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
test1	299980.3 Ops/sec
Test2	317565.8 Ops/sec
double while	758897.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

twe1awe45as32d1aw6d45 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: test1 vs Test2 vs double while

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

test1

Test2

double while

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):