var list = [],
n = 0;
while(true) {
n++;
list.push(document.createElement('div'));
if(n===100000)
break;
}
var list = [],
n = 0,
node = document.createElement('div');
while(true) {
n++;
list.push(node.cloneNode());
if(n===100000)
break;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
createElement | |
cloneNode |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
createElement | 22.2 Ops/sec |
cloneNode | 24.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON to understand what is being tested and compare different approaches.
What is being tested?
The benchmark tests two ways to create new DOM elements: createElement
and cloneNode()
. The goal is to determine which method is faster for creating a large number of elements before inserting them into the document.
Options compared:
createElement
: Creates a new DOM element from scratch using the document.createElement()
method.cloneNode
: Clones an existing DOM node (in this case, a div
element) using the node.cloneNode()
method to create multiple copies of it.Pros and Cons:
cloneNode
: Pros:Library usage:
None of the test cases use any external libraries.
Special JavaScript features or syntax:
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It focuses solely on comparing two DOM-related methods.
Other alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative approaches, consider:
document.createDocumentFragment()
to create a container element and append your elements to it.Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and code complexity.