Benchmark: asdasdasdasdsadasd

Tests:

is
let x; Object.is(x,undefined)
IIFE
let x; x === (function(window, undefined){ // undefined }(this))
typeof
let x; typeof(x) === 'undefined'
void
let x; x === void(0)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
is
IIFE
typeof
void

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition with no specific test case or script preparation code. It seems that this is a basic template for creating a new benchmark on MeasureThat.net.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are four test cases:

1. `is`
	* Benchmark Definition: `let x; Object.is(x, undefined)`
2. `IIFE` (Immediately Invoked Function Expression)
	* Benchmark Definition: `let x; x === (function(window, undefined){\r\n  // undefined\r\n}(this))`
3. `typeof`
	* Benchmark Definition: `let x; typeof(x) === 'undefined'`
4. `void`
	* Benchmark Definition: `let x; x === void(0)`

**What's being tested?**

Each test case is comparing the execution time of a specific JavaScript construct:

1. `is`: The comparison operator `Object.is()` (introduced in ECMAScript 2015).
2. `IIFE`: An Immediately Invoked Function Expression (IIFE) with an anonymous function that checks for `undefined`.
3. `typeof`: The `typeof` operator, which returns the type of a variable.
4. `void`: A comparison with `void(0)`, which is equivalent to `false`.

**Options compared**

Each test case compares two options:

1. `is`: `Object.is()` vs. a simple equality check (`x === undefined`)
2. `IIFE`: The IIFE with the anonymous function vs. a direct assignment (`x = undefined`)
3. `typeof`: The `typeof` operator vs. a string literal comparison (`typeof(x) === 'undefined'`)
4. `void`: `void(0)` vs. a simple equality check (`x === void(0)`)

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some general pros and cons of each approach:

1. `is`:
	* Pros: `Object.is()` is designed to handle NaN (Not a Number) and Infinity values, making it more robust than a simple equality check.
	* Cons: It might be slower due to its additional checks.
2. `IIFE`:
	* Pros: The IIFE allows for more control over the execution environment and can help avoid global variable pollution.
	* Cons: It's often unnecessary and may add complexity to the code.
3. `typeof`:
	* Pros: The `typeof` operator is a standard part of JavaScript and provides a clear way to check the type of a variable.
	* Cons: It might not work as expected for certain types, like functions or objects.
4. `void`:
	* Pros: Using `void(0)` is a concise and efficient way to represent falsey values.
	* Cons: It's not immediately clear what this syntax means, especially for developers unfamiliar with JavaScript.

**Library**

There are no external libraries used in these test cases.

**Special JS features or syntax**

None of the test cases use special JS features or syntax. They only rely on standard JavaScript constructs and operators.

**Other alternatives**

If you wanted to compare other options, here are a few examples:

* Instead of `Object.is()`, you could use `===` for equality checks.
* For IIFE, you could compare it to a direct assignment (`x = undefined`) or another type of function invocation (e.g., `new Function('return undefined;')()`).
* For `typeof`, you could compare it to other type-checking methods like `instanceof` or `constructor`.
* For `void`, you could compare it to other falsey values, such as `false`, `0`, or an empty string (`''`).

Keep in mind that these alternatives might change the behavior of your benchmark and affect its accuracy.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/79.0.3945.117 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 79 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
is	2445019.5 Ops/sec
IIFE	726245376.0 Ops/sec
typeof	729168000.0 Ops/sec
void	725138048.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

asdasdasdasdsadasd (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: is vs IIFE vs typeof vs void

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

is

IIFE

typeof

void

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):