Benchmark: RegExp.test() vs String.match()

Script Preparation code:

var reStr = '^[0-9]+$';
var re = new RegExp(re);

Tests:

RegExp.test()
!re.test('123');
String.match()
!'123'.match(reStr);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
RegExp.test()
String.match()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark that compares two approaches for testing regular expressions (REs) in JavaScript: `RegExp.test()` and `String.match()`. The benchmark measures the performance difference between these two methods when used with a specific regular expression pattern (`^[0-9]+$`) on a string literal `'123'`.

**Options compared**

Two options are being compared:

1. **`RegExp.test()`**: This method tests if the entire string matches the regular expression.
2. **`String.match()`**: This method returns an array of matches or `null` if no match is found.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **`RegExp.test()`**:
	* Pros: More intuitive for simple cases, can be more efficient when used with a single regular expression.
	* Cons: Can be slower than `String.match()` for complex patterns or when used with multiple matches.
2. **`String.match()`**:
	* Pros: Faster and more memory-efficient for complex patterns or when used with multiple matches, as it returns an array of matches instead of testing the entire string.
	* Cons: Less intuitive for simple cases, may require additional processing to extract individual matches.

**Library and purpose**

In this benchmark, `RegExp` is a built-in JavaScript library that provides regular expression functionality. Its purpose is to test if a given string matches a specified pattern.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

None mentioned in the provided code snippet.

**Other alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider:

1. **Using a different regular expression engine**: Some browsers have built-in support for other regex engines, like V8 (used by Chrome) or SpiderMonkey (used by Firefox). However, these differences are usually negligible and depend on the specific browser.
2. **Implementing custom regex functionality**: You could write your own custom regex implementation using JavaScript's `String.prototype` methods or other libraries like `regex-execution`. This approach would require significant effort and optimization to match the performance of built-in engines.

**Benchmark preparation code**

The provided script preparation code creates a regular expression object (`re`) using the pattern `^[0-9]+$`, which matches only digits from start to end. The test cases use this regular expression with different approaches: `RegExp.test()` and `String.match()`.

**Individual test cases**

Each test case has two parts:

1. **Benchmark Definition**: A simple JavaScript statement that exercises one of the comparison methods (e.g., `!re.test('123')` or `'123'.match(reStr)`).
2. **Test Name**: The name of the test case, which in this example is "RegExp.test()" and "String.match()".

**Latest benchmark result**

The provided JSON contains two benchmark results for each test case:

1. **RawUAString**: A string representing the user agent (browser type) that ran the benchmark.
2. **Browser**: The specific browser version used to run the benchmark.
3. **DevicePlatform**: The device platform (Desktop, Mobile, etc.) used to run the benchmark.
4. **OperatingSystem**: The operating system used to run the benchmark.
5. **ExecutionsPerSecond**: The number of times each test case was executed per second.

These results provide insight into how different browsers and environments perform when running these specific test cases.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:70.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/70.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 70 on Mac OS X 10.14

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
RegExp.test()	30955626.0 Ops/sec
String.match()	5042227.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

RegExp.test() vs String.match() (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: RegExp.test() vs String.match()

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

RegExp.test()

String.match()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):