Benchmark: unique objects in array by value using filter

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var analysisAuthors = [{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Apollinaire"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Apollinaire"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Apollinaire"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Apollinaire"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Apollinaire"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Apollinaire"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"De Lafayette"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Beckett"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Montesquieu"},{"studyField":"novel","authorName":"Yourcenar"}]

Tests:

_.uniqBy
_.uniqBy(analysisAuthors, "authorName")
Set
Array.from(new Set(analysisAuthors.map(a => a.authorName))) .map(authorName => { return analysisAuthors.find(a => a.authorName === authorName) })
findIndex
analysisAuthors.filter((author, index, authorsList) => authorsList .findIndex(authorInList => authorInList.authorName === author.authorName) === index)
reduce
analysisAuthors.reduce((acc, current) => { const x = acc.find(item => item.authorName === current.authorName); if (!x) { return acc.concat([current]); } else { return acc; } }, [])

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.uniqBy
Set
findIndex
reduce

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of different approaches to remove duplicates from an array based on a specific property (in this case, `authorName`). The benchmark uses a predefined dataset (`analysisAuthors`) and compares four different methods:

1. Using Lodash's `_.uniqBy` function
2. Converting the array to a set and then mapping over it
3. Using `Array.prototype.filter` with `findIndex`
4. Using `Array.prototype.reduce`

**Options Comparison**

Here's a brief overview of each option:

### 1. Lodash's _.uniqBy

* **Purpose**: Removes duplicates from an array based on a specified property.
* **Pros**: Efficient, concise, and well-documented.
* **Cons**: May not be suitable for very large datasets due to the overhead of the Lodash library.

### 2. Converting to Set and Mapping

* **Purpose**: Similar to _.uniqBy, but uses native JavaScript features instead of a library.
* **Pros**: Lightweight, efficient, and can handle larger datasets.
* **Cons**: May be less concise than using a library like Lodash.

### 3. findIndex in Array.prototype.filter

* **Purpose**: Removes duplicates from an array by filtering out elements that have already been seen.
* **Pros**: Efficient, easy to understand, and works well with large datasets.
* **Cons**: Can be slower for very large datasets due to the overhead of the `findIndex` method.

### 4. Array.prototype.reduce

* **Purpose**: Similar to findIndex in Array.prototype.filter, but uses a cumulative reduction approach.
* **Pros**: Efficient, easy to understand, and works well with large datasets.
* **Cons**: Can be slower for very small datasets due to the overhead of the reduce method.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a collection of useful functions for working with arrays, objects, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash's `_.uniqBy` function is used to remove duplicates from the array based on the `authorName` property.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax: None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options:

* Using `Map` instead of Lodash's `_.uniqBy`
* Using `Array.prototype.forEach` and manual iteration to remove duplicates
* Using a custom implementation without relying on any libraries or built-in methods

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have varying trade-offs in terms of performance, conciseness, and readability.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/78.0.3904.108 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 78 on Mac OS X 10.14.5

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
_.uniqBy	1259674.4 Ops/sec
Set	538120.0 Ops/sec
findIndex	3976491.0 Ops/sec
reduce	729870.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

unique objects in array by value using filter (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: _.uniqBy vs Set vs findIndex vs reduce

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

_.uniqBy

Set

findIndex

reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):