<script type="text/javascript" src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.min.js"></script>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
var el = $(".test");
var el = document.querySelectorAll('.test');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery | |
Vanilla JS |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery | 376643.3 Ops/sec |
Vanilla JS | 917216.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations.
Benchmark Overview
The test measures the performance of two ways to retrieve an HTML element by its ID using JavaScript: jQuery and vanilla JavaScript (also known as Document.getElementById).
Options Being Compared
Document.getElementById
): Uses the built-in document.getElementById
method to retrieve an element by its ID. This approach is lightweight and fast but requires manual DOM manipulation.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Document.getElementById
):Library and Purpose
The jQuery library is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. In this benchmark, it's used to select elements by their ID using the $
symbol ($(id)
). The purpose of this library is to provide a more convenient and efficient way to interact with the DOM.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It only involves standard JavaScript functions like document.getElementById
.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative libraries or methods to select elements by ID, consider:
Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide the same level of convenience as jQuery or vanilla JavaScript's document.getElementById
.
Overall, this benchmark provides a simple yet informative way to compare the performance of two commonly used approaches to retrieving elements by ID in JavaScript.