var bool = false;
bool === null
typeof bool === 'boolean'
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Strict equality | |
Typeof |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Strict equality | 19328202.0 Ops/sec |
Typeof | 18311820.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to check if a variable is of type boolean
: strict equality (===
) versus using the typeof
operator with 'boolean'
.
Script Preparation Code:
The script starts by setting a variable bool
to false
.
Html Preparation Code: (empty) There's no HTML code provided for preparation, so we can assume it's not relevant to this specific benchmark.
Individual Test Cases: We have two test cases:
bool === null
): This test case is checking if the strict equality operator (===
) returns true when comparing bool
with null
.typeof bool === 'boolean'
): This test case is checking if the typeof
operator returns 'boolean'
when evaluating bool
.Libraries and Special JS Features:
There are no libraries explicitly mentioned, but we can assume that the JavaScript engine being tested supports the typeof
operator.
Pros and Cons of Different Approaches:
===
):==
.'boolean'
:bool
might be converted to a boolean value (e.g., using Boolean(bool)
).Considerations:
===
) is often sufficient and faster.typeof
operator might be a better choice for ensuring type correctness.Other Alternatives:
For additional testing or verification, you could consider using other methods to check if a value is of type boolean
, such as:
instanceof
operator (bool instanceof Boolean
) to check if bool
is an instance of the Boolean
constructor.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be necessary for this specific benchmark, but they could provide additional insights into the performance and behavior of different approach.