Benchmark: lodash find vs for loop 2

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Tests:

Lodash Find
let field = "connection_status"; let gridColumn = [ { headerName: "Participant", field: "companyname" }, { headerName: "Participant", field: "companyname" }, { headerName: "Line Id", field: "sendercomp" }, { headerName: "User Type", field: "user_type" }, { headerName: "User Id", field: "user_id" }, { headerName: "Crd", field: "crd" }, { headerName: "Source IP", field: "source_ip" }, { headerName: "Source Port", field: "source_port" }, { headerName: "Last Connection", field: "last_connection" }, { headerName: "Pri IP", field: "pri_ip" }, { headerName: "Pri Module", field: "pri_module" }, { headerName: "Sec IP", field: "sec_ip" }, { headerName: "Sec Module", field: "sec_module" }, { headerName: "Sod", field: "sodcount" }, { headerName: "Eod", field: "eodcount" }, { headerName: "Seq", field: "last_seq" }, { headerName: "PRN", field: "last_prn" }, { headerName: "RSeq", field: "gt_seq" }, { headerName: "GT Stream", field: "gt_stream" }, { headerName: "Pri Connected", field: "pri_connected" }, { headerName: "Sec Connected", field: "sec_connected" }, { headerName: "Port", field: "port" }, { headerName: "DR Pri IP", field: "dr_pri_ip" }, { headerName: "DR Sec IP", field: "dr_sec_ip" }, { headerName: "Total Conn", field: "n_connect" }, { headerName: "Total Conn Attempts", field: "n_conn_attempt" }, { headerName: "Session Status", field: "session_status" }, { headerName: "Connection Status", field: "connection_status" } ]; function test(gridColumn, field){ let column = _.find(gridColumn, { field: field }); return column ? column.headerName : field; }; let result = test(gridColumn, field);
For loop
let field = "connection_status"; let gridColumn = [ { headerName: "Participant", field: "companyname" }, { headerName: "Participant", field: "companyname" }, { headerName: "Line Id", field: "sendercomp" }, { headerName: "User Type", field: "user_type" }, { headerName: "User Id", field: "user_id" }, { headerName: "Crd", field: "crd" }, { headerName: "Source IP", field: "source_ip" }, { headerName: "Source Port", field: "source_port" }, { headerName: "Last Connection", field: "last_connection" }, { headerName: "Pri IP", field: "pri_ip" }, { headerName: "Pri Module", field: "pri_module" }, { headerName: "Sec IP", field: "sec_ip" }, { headerName: "Sec Module", field: "sec_module" }, { headerName: "Sod", field: "sodcount" }, { headerName: "Eod", field: "eodcount" }, { headerName: "Seq", field: "last_seq" }, { headerName: "PRN", field: "last_prn" }, { headerName: "RSeq", field: "gt_seq" }, { headerName: "GT Stream", field: "gt_stream" }, { headerName: "Pri Connected", field: "pri_connected" }, { headerName: "Sec Connected", field: "sec_connected" }, { headerName: "Port", field: "port" }, { headerName: "DR Pri IP", field: "dr_pri_ip" }, { headerName: "DR Sec IP", field: "dr_sec_ip" }, { headerName: "Total Conn", field: "n_connect" }, { headerName: "Total Conn Attempts", field: "n_conn_attempt" }, { headerName: "Session Status", field: "session_status" }, { headerName: "Connection Status", field: "connection_status" } ]; function test(gridColumn, field){ for (var i = 0, len = gridColumn.length; i < len; i++) { if (gridColumn[i].field === field) { return gridColumn[i].headerName; } } return field; }; let result = test(gridColumn, field);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash Find
For loop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation.

The benchmark being tested is the performance difference between using `_.find` from Lodash and a traditional for loop to find an element in an array.

**Options Compared:**

1. **Lodash Find**: Uses the `_.` namespace to call the `find` method on the `gridColumn` array, passing the target value (`field`) as an argument.
2. **For Loop**: Iterates through each element of the `gridColumn` array using a traditional for loop, checking if the current element's `field` property matches the target value.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Lodash Find**:
	+ Pros:
		- Faster execution time due to optimized C++ implementation.
		- More concise code.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires Lodash library to be included in the HTML document (as shown in the benchmark setup).
		- May not be suitable for very large arrays or performance-critical applications.
* **For Loop**:
	+ Pros:
		- No external dependencies required.
		- Can be more intuitive for developers familiar with traditional array iteration.
	+ Cons:
		- Slower execution time due to JavaScript's overhead and potential loop optimizations.
		- More verbose code.

**Benchmark Results:**

The latest benchmark results show that the **For Loop** implementation is significantly slower than the **Lodash Find** implementation, with an average of 2274949.5 executions per second vs. 386342.59375 executions per second for Chrome Mobile 81 on Android.

Keep in mind that these results may vary depending on the specific use case, array size, and hardware configuration.

Overall, the benchmark suggests that using Lodash's `find` method can provide a significant performance boost for this particular operation, but it's essential to consider the trade-offs, including the added dependency on an external library.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; ONEPLUS A6003) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/81.0.4044.111 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 81 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash Find	386342.6 Ops/sec
For loop	2274949.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

lodash find vs for loop 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash Find vs For loop

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash Find

For loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):