Benchmark: getElementById vs getElementsByClassName

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="header">
		<div id="logo">
			<img src="images/logo.png" alt="the network"/>
		</div>	
		<div id="search">
			<form method="get">
				<input type="text" name="post" placeholder="thoughts?"/>
				<input type="submit" value="Post">
			</form>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>

Tests:

getElementById.childNodes
var form = document.getElementById("search").childNodes[0];
getElementById.getElementsByTagName
var form = document.getElementById("search").getElementsByTagName("form")[0];
getElementsByTagName
var form = document.getElementsByTagName("form")[0];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
getElementById.childNodes
getElementById.getElementsByTagName
getElementsByTagName

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its components.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance of two different approaches to accessing an HTML element: `getElementById` with and without calling `childNodes`. Additionally, it tests `getElementsByTagName` to see how it compares in terms of performance.

**Options Compared**

1. **getElementById**: This method is used to access an element by its ID attribute. When called, it returns a single element object.
2. **getElementsByTagName**: This method is used to get all elements with a specified tag name. In this case, we're testing `form` elements.
3. **getElementById.childNodes[0]**: This approach uses `getElementById` and then accesses the first child node of the returned element using `[0]`.
4. **getElementById.getElementsByTagName** (Note: This is not a standard method; it seems like an error in the benchmark definition): This would be used to access all elements with the name "form" by their ID, but since there's no such attribute, it doesn't make sense.

Pros and Cons of each approach:

* **getElementById**: Pros - fast and efficient for single-element lookups. Cons - may not work as expected if multiple elements have the same ID.
* **getElementsByTagName**: Pros - flexible, can be used to get all elements with a specific tag name. Cons - slower than `getElementById` since it needs to iterate over all matching elements.

**Libraries and Special Features**

None of the provided code snippet includes any external libraries or special JavaScript features.

**Other Considerations**

* **Browser-specific behavior**: The benchmark is running on Chrome 114, which may have different performance characteristics compared to other browsers.
* **Device platform**: The test is being run on a desktop device with Linux as the operating system. This may impact performance due to differences in hardware or OS optimization.

**Alternative Approaches**

Other methods for accessing elements in JavaScript include:

1. `document.querySelector` (a more modern alternative to `getElementById`)
2. `document.querySelectorAll` (for getting all matching elements)
3. Using a CSS selector (e.g., `#header > form`)

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 114 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
getElementById.childNodes	3884621.8 Ops/sec
getElementById.getElementsByTagName	2888361.2 Ops/sec
getElementsByTagName	3415455.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

getElementById vs getElementsByClassName (version: 0)

getElementById vs getElementsByClassName

Comparing performance of: getElementById.childNodes vs getElementById.getElementsByTagName vs getElementsByTagName

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

getElementById.childNodes

getElementById.getElementsByTagName

getElementsByTagName

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):