Benchmark: JQuery version speed test jQuery 3.4.1 and stuffs

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.0/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1120 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq311 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq340 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({
      "background-color": "green"
    })).end().end().remove();
  $(document).width();
  $(document).height();
}

Tests:

Test jQuery 1.12.0
tests($jq1120);
Test jQuery 2.2.4
tests($jq224);
Test jQuery 3.1.1
tests($jq311);
Test jQuery 3.3.1
tests($jq331);
Test jQuery 3.4.1
tests($jq340);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Test jQuery 1.12.0
Test jQuery 2.2.4
Test jQuery 3.1.1
Test jQuery 3.3.1
Test jQuery 3.4.1

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark.

**Overview**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of different versions of the popular JavaScript library, jQuery. The test involves executing a script that performs various operations on an HTML document containing a menu item list.

**Options Compared**

There are five different versions of jQuery compared:

1. **jQuery 3.4.1**: The latest version tested.
2. **jQuery 3.3.1**: A previous version compared to the latest one.
3. **jQuery 3.1.1**: Another previous version compared to the latest one.
4. **jQuery 2.2.4**: An older version compared to the newer ones.
5. **jQuery 1.12.0**: The oldest version tested.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Each version of jQuery has its own strengths and weaknesses:

* **Latest versions (3.4.1, 3.3.1, 3.1.1)**: These versions have improved performance, new features, and better support for modern web development. However, they might not be fully compatible with older browsers or older codebases.
* **Older versions (2.2.4, 1.12.0)**: These versions are likely to be more compatible with older browsers and codebases, but may have slower performance and fewer features compared to newer versions.

**Library Usage**

The benchmark uses jQuery's `$.noConflict()` method to load multiple versions of the library on the same page, without interfering with each other. This allows the test to compare the performance of different versions of the library.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The script only uses standard jQuery methods and operations.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in comparing the performance of different JavaScript libraries, here are some alternatives:

* **Lodash**: A popular utility library that can be used for similar operations as jQuery.
* **Pure.js**: A lightweight alternative to jQuery that aims to provide a similar API without the overhead.
* **Vanilla JavaScript**: Using native JavaScript methods and functions instead of relying on a library.

Keep in mind that each library has its own strengths, weaknesses, and use cases. The choice of which library to use depends on your specific project requirements and performance needs.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/95.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 95 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Test jQuery 1.12.0	14065.9 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 2.2.4	19389.3 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 3.1.1	18803.4 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 3.3.1	19431.5 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 3.4.1	18326.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

JQuery version speed test jQuery 3.4.1 and stuffs (version: 3)

JQuery version speed test

Comparing performance of: Test jQuery 1.12.0 vs Test jQuery 2.2.4 vs Test jQuery 3.1.1 vs Test jQuery 3.3.1 vs Test jQuery 3.4.1

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Test jQuery 1.12.0

Test jQuery 2.2.4

Test jQuery 3.1.1

Test jQuery 3.3.1

Test jQuery 3.4.1

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):