let arr = new Array(100000)
for (var i=0; i<1000; i++) {
arr[i] = Math.random;
}
arr = arr.slice(0, 1000)
let arr =[]
for (var i=0; i<1000; i++) {
arr.push(Math.random);
}
let arr = new Array(1200)
for (var i=0; i<1000; i++) {
arr[i] = Math.random;
}
arr = arr.slice(0, 1000)
let arr = new Array(1000)
for (var i=0; i<1000; i++) {
arr[i] = Math.random;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Preinitialized size - large difference | |
Push | |
Preinitialized size - small difference | |
Preinitilized size - no difference |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Preinitialized size - large difference | 4499.9 Ops/sec |
Push | 7527.0 Ops/sec |
Preinitialized size - small difference | 8231.4 Ops/sec |
Preinitilized size - no difference | 8265.1 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches: preinitializing an array with a specific size and using the push
method to add elements to an empty array.
Preinitialized Array Size vs Push Operations
The tests compare the execution time of two scenarios:
push
to add 1,000 random elements to it.Options Compared
The two main options being compared are:
push
method to add elements to an empty arrayPros and Cons of Each Approach
Preinitialized Array Size:
Pros:
Cons:
Push Method:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used
None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, some libraries might be used for parsing the HTML preparation code or executing the test cases (e.g., JavaScript engines like V8).
Special JS Features or Syntax
No special features or syntax are mentioned in the benchmark definition. If there were any, they would likely be related to performance optimization techniques.
Other Alternatives
To measure similar performance characteristics, you might consider using other methods:
Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely have significant changes to the benchmark code and might not produce comparable results.