Benchmark: Sort Array Benchmark 1k, 5k, 10k...ll

Script Preparation code:

var k1 = new Array(1000); // generate a new int[]

for (i = 0; i < k1.length; i++) {
  k1[i] = i; // generate a random number
}

var k5 = new Array(5000); // generate a new int[]

for (i = 0; i < k5.length; i++) {
  k5[i] = i; // generate a random number
}

Tests:

k1 sort
k1.sort((f,s) => f < s ? -1 : 1)
k5 sort
k5.sort()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
k1 sort
k5 sort

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested, compared, and analyzed in the MeasureThat.net JavaScript microbenchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**
The benchmark definition consists of two parts:

1. **Script Preparation Code**: This code generates two arrays (`k1` and `k5`) with a specified number of elements (1000, 5000, 10,000, etc.). The elements are initialized with random numbers.
2. **Html Preparation Code**: This is an empty string, indicating that no HTML-related setup is required for the benchmark.

**Individual Test Cases**
There are two test cases:

1. **Test Case 1: k1.sort((f,s) => f < s ? -1 : 1)**:
	* This code sorts the `k1` array using a custom comparison function.
	* The purpose of this test is to measure the performance of sorting a small array with a specific sorting algorithm (in this case, the default JavaScript sort algorithm).
2. **Test Case 2: k5.sort()**:
	* This code sorts the `k5` array without providing any custom comparison function.
	* The purpose of this test is to measure the performance of sorting a larger array with the default JavaScript sort algorithm.

**Comparison**
The two test cases compare the performance of sorting small arrays (`k1`) and large arrays (`k5`). The tests are likely designed to identify performance differences between these scenarios.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

* **Small Array Sorting (k1.sort())**: This approach is often faster than sorting a large array, as it only needs to compare fewer elements. However, it may not be representative of real-world use cases where large arrays are common.
* **Large Array Sorting (k5.sort())**: This approach is more representative of real-world use cases but can be slower due to the larger number of comparisons required.

**Library and Purpose**
None of the libraries are explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON data. However, it's likely that MeasureThat.net uses a library or framework for benchmarking JavaScript code.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**
There is no explicit mention of special JavaScript features or syntax being used in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

* **Alternative sorting algorithms**: Instead of using the default JavaScript sort algorithm, alternative sorting algorithms like quicksort, mergesort, or heapsort could be tested.
* **Parallel sorting**: Testing sorting algorithms on multiple arrays simultaneously to measure parallelization benefits.
* **Different data types**: Using different data types (e.g., strings, objects) instead of numbers to test the robustness of the sorting algorithm.

In summary, this benchmark is designed to compare the performance of small and large array sorting using the default JavaScript sort algorithm. The results can help identify performance differences between these scenarios and provide insight into how sorting algorithms perform in different contexts.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/66.0.3359.181 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 66 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
k1 sort	6727.4 Ops/sec
k5 sort	564.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Sort Array Benchmark 1k, 5k, 10k...ll (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: k1 sort vs k5 sort

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

k1 sort

k5 sort

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):