Benchmark: .indexOf vs .startsWith vs .substr

HTML Preparation code:

<div></div>

Script Preparation code:

window.regex = /^test/;
window.match = 'test';
var data = window.data = [];
const possible = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";
var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS = 100000;

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

function makeRandomString(len) {
  var text = "";
  for( var i=0; i < len; i++ ) {
    text += possible.charAt(getRandomInt(possible.length));
  }
  return text;
}

while (data.length < TOTAL_STRINGS) {
  data.push(makeRandomString(getRandomInt(20)));
}

Tests:

substr
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var regex = window.regex; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; str.substr(0, match.length) !== match x += 1; }
.indexOf
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var match = window.match; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; str.indexOf(match) === 0; x += 1; }
.startsWith
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var match = window.match; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; str.startsWith(match); x += 1; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
substr
.indexOf
.startsWith

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The MeasureThat.net benchmark tests the performance of three string manipulation methods in JavaScript: `substr`, `.indexOf`, and `.startsWith`. The test generates 100,000 random strings and iterates through them to measure the execution time for each method.

**Options Compared**

1. **`substr`**: This method returns a substring from the original string. In this benchmark, it's used to extract a portion of the string, but the starting index is not specified. The test checks if `str.substr(0, match.length) !== match`.
2. **`.indexOf`**: This method returns the index of the first occurrence of a substring in the original string. In this benchmark, it's used to find the index of the match string within each generated string. The test checks if `str.indexOf(match) === 0`, which means finding the exact match at the beginning.
3. **`.startsWith`**: This method returns a boolean indicating whether the original string starts with the specified substring. In this benchmark, it's used to check if each generated string starts with the match string.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **`substr`**:
	* Pros: Can be faster for large strings or specific use cases where only a portion is needed.
	* Cons: Requires careful indexing, as mentioned in the benchmark code ( `str.substr(0, match.length) !== match` ).
2. **`.indexOf`**:
	* Pros: Generally fast and efficient for finding exact matches at the beginning of a string.
	* Cons: May be slower for large strings or cases where the substring is not found.
3. **`.startsWith`**:
	* Pros: Fast and efficient for simple string checks, as it only requires checking the first few characters.
	* Cons: May be slower for longer strings or more complex checks.

**Library Used**

None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, `regex` is used to define a regular expression pattern (`/^test/`), which is not directly related to string manipulation but rather serves as a preparation step.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no specific JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark beyond the standard methods being tested (`.substr`, `.indexOf`, and `.startsWith`). The focus is on measuring the performance of these built-in methods.

**Other Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches to string manipulation might include:

* Using a different method, such as `slice()` or `substring()`
* Utilizing a library like Lodash for more complex string operations
* Employing regular expressions with groups (e.g., `(.*?)(?!...)`) for matching and extracting substrings

Keep in mind that the performance differences between these methods may vary depending on the specific use case, JavaScript engine, and platform.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/69.0.3497.100 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 69 on Mac OS X 10.13.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
substr	25.9 Ops/sec
.indexOf	808.5 Ops/sec
.startsWith	151.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

.indexOf vs .startsWith vs .substr (version: 0)

Testing some things

Comparing performance of: substr vs .indexOf vs .startsWith

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

substr

.indexOf

.startsWith

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):