var array = new Array(2);
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i];
}
array.forEach(function(i) {
array[i];
});
array.some(function(i) {
array[i];
});
for (var i of array) {
array[i];
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for | |
foreach | |
some | |
for..of |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for | 2287985.0 Ops/sec |
foreach | 10626058.0 Ops/sec |
some | 9163676.0 Ops/sec |
for..of | 3399087.2 Ops/sec |
What is tested on the provided JSON?
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares the performance of four different loop constructs in JavaScript: for
, foreach
, some
, and for..of
. The test case uses an array with 2 elements, and each loop construct iterates over this array to access its elements.
Options compared:
for
loop: A traditional loop that increments a counter variable (i
) to iterate over the array.foreach
loop: A loop that uses the forEach()
method of an array to iterate over its elements, without explicitly accessing them using indexing.some
loop: A loop that uses the some()
method of an array to test a condition for each element, and returns as soon as the condition is true. This loop can be faster than foreach
because it stops iterating as soon as the condition is met.for..of
loop: A modern loop introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), which uses the for...of
statement to iterate over arrays and other iterable objects.Pros and Cons of each approach:
for
loop:foreach
loop:some
, since it always iterates over the entire array.some
loop:foreach
, especially if the condition is not met for most elements.for..of
loop:Library usage
There is no explicit library used in the provided benchmark.
Special JS features or syntax
The some()
method is a built-in JavaScript method that uses the Array.prototype.some()
internal method. The for..of
loop is a new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), which allows iterating over arrays using a more concise and expressive syntax.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some additional options:
Map.prototype.forEach()
or Set.prototype.forEach()
: These methods can provide similar benefits to the some
loop, but may require an extra step for iteration.Array.prototype.map()
or Array.prototype.filter()
: These methods can be used in combination with forEach
to achieve similar results.Iterator
and IteratorResult
interfaces, but provides fine-grained control over iteration.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics or require more code complexity, so it's essential to weigh the trade-offs before selecting an alternative.