Benchmark: Math.pow vs ** vs * vs eToNumber

Script Preparation code:

var a = 100000000;

Tests:

pow
var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000)); var i = 8; var tmp = tmp/Math.pow(10, i);
**
var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000)); var i = 8; var tmp = tmp/(10 ** i);
*
var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000)); var i = 8; while(i-- > 0){ tmp = tmp/10; }
e to number
var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000)); var i = 8; var tmp = tmp/Number(10+'e'+i);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
pow
**
*
e to number

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/99.0.4844.84 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 99 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
pow	37991288.0 Ops/sec
**	72940336.0 Ops/sec
*	19437200.0 Ops/sec
e to number	39124744.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 8 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

This benchmark compares the performance of four different methods to divide a number by a power of ten in JavaScript. The benchmark aims to identify which approach is the fastest by measuring how many times each method can execute within a second.

### Comparison of Approaches:

1. **Math.pow**:
   - **Test Name**: `pow`
   - **Benchmark Definition**: 
     ```javascript
     var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000));
     var i = 8;
     var tmp = tmp/Math.pow(10, i);
     ```
   - **Description**: This method uses the `Math.pow` function to calculate \(10^i\) and then performs the division.
   - **Pros**: This approach is straightforward and readable, making it clear what is happening.
   - **Cons**: Function calls in JavaScript can have overhead, making this potentially slower than direct arithmetic operations.

2. **Exponentiation Operator (`**`)**:
   - **Test Name**: `**`
   - **Benchmark Definition**: 
     ```javascript
     var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000));
     var i = 8;
     var tmp = tmp/(10 ** i);
     ```
   - **Description**: This uses the modern exponentiation operator to perform the same calculation.
   - **Pros**: The syntax is clean and concise, and it is often optimized by JavaScript engines.
   - **Cons**: While user-friendly, it might not be supported in older browsers, though this is increasingly rare.

3. **Multiplicative Loop**:
   - **Test Name**: `*`
   - **Benchmark Definition**: 
     ```javascript
     var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000));
     var i = 8;
     while(i-- > 0){
         tmp = tmp/10;
     }
     ```
   - **Description**: This method divides by 10 in a loop for `i` iterations.
   - **Pros**: It is a simple approach that doesn’t rely on built-in functions.
   - **Cons**: The loop can introduce overhead, especially as the number of iterations increases, making it potentially slower than other methods.

4. **String Representation with Exponential Notation**:
   - **Test Name**: `e to number`
   - **Benchmark Definition**: 
     ```javascript
     var tmp = Math.round((Math.random()*100000000));
     var i = 8;
     var tmp = tmp/Number(10+'e'+i);
     ```
   - **Description**: This method leverages JavaScript's ability to interpret strings in exponential notation to convert `10e8`.
   - **Pros**: It can be quite fast due to the direct use of number parsing without performing repeated operations.
   - **Cons**: This approach could be less readable for developers unfamiliar with string manipulation and might be seen as a workaround rather than a direct calculation.

### Benchmark Results:
The results show the number of executions per second for each method. The exponentiation operator (`**`) was the fastest, achieving approximately 72.9 million executions per second. The other methods followed, with `e to number` at around 39.1 million, `Math.pow` at about 37.9 million, and the multiplicative loop (`*`) trailing at approximately 19.4 million executions per second.

### Considerations and Alternatives:
While the benchmark tests were compared within a specific context of dividing by powers of ten, similar performance comparisons can be made for other mathematical operations or leveraging different libraries, like:
- **Lodash**: Provides utility functions but typically won't outperform native operations.
- **Math.js**: A library for advanced mathematics but can introduce overhead.

Ultimately, for these types of operations, native JavaScript arithmetic is usually preferred for performance, while more complex mathematical tasks may benefit from dedicated libraries. Furthermore, developers should consider readability and maintainability alongside performance when choosing their approaches.

Related benchmarks:

Math.pow vs ** vs * vs eToNumber (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: pow vs ** vs * vs e to number

Created: 8 days ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

pow

**

*

e to number

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 8 days ago):