var node = document.createTextNode("test");
var node = document.createTextNode("test");
var node = document.createTextNode("");
node.nodeValue = "test";
var node = document.createTextNode(null);
node.nodeValue = "test";
var node = document.createTextNode(undefined);
node.nodeValue = "test";
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
createTextNode("test") | |
createTextNode("") | |
createTextNode(null) | |
createTextNode(undefined) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
createTextNode("test") | 2689873.8 Ops/sec |
createTextNode("") | 2397189.8 Ops/sec |
createTextNode(null) | 1716130.6 Ops/sec |
createTextNode(undefined) | 1437679.5 Ops/sec |
The benchmark defined in the provided JSON evaluates different ways to create a text node in the DOM using the document.createTextNode
method and then setting its nodeValue
. This test specifically compares the performance of different methods of creating and manipulating these text nodes in JavaScript.
createTextNode("test")
createTextNode("")
node.nodeValue
.createTextNode(null)
null
, followed by setting the nodeValue
to "test".createTextNode(undefined)
null
case, but starts with undefined
, then sets the nodeValue
to "test".createTextNode("test")
createTextNode("")
nodeValue
, which might add overhead, particularly in cases where performance is critical.createTextNode(null)
null
which may indicate a deliberate intention to create an undefined node initially.null
to a string differently, which could lead to unpredictable behaviors in certain scenarios.createTextNode(undefined)
null
case; can be useful when you’re initializing a variable whose actual value will be set later.undefined
may not be consistent across browsers and especially when it involves implicitly converting to a string.createTextNode("test")
is the fastest option, while createTextNode(undefined)
is the slowest, reflecting the overhead associated with initializing the node's value to undefined
or null
before the actual value setting occurs.Other possible alternatives to using document.createTextNode()
could include:
InnerHTML: Instead of creating text nodes manually, using innerHTML
can dynamically update an entire element, but this approach can be less secure and inefficient for text-only updates due to HTML parsing.
Text Content and Creating Elements: Using element.textContent
to add text directly to an HTML element rather than creating text nodes can sometimes be more concise and may offer performance benefits in more complex DOM manipulation.
Template Literals: For generating HTML content, template literals can be a more readable and concise alternative, especially when coupled with innerHTML
.
In conclusion, the benchmark effectively showcases the performance characteristics of distinct approaches to text node creation and manipulation, illustrating important considerations for JavaScript developers looking to optimize DOM interactions.