var string = "test.user@example.com";
var regex = /^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@"]+)*)|(".+"))@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$/;
regex.exec(string) !== null;
regex.test(string);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
regex.exec | |
regex.test |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
regex.exec | 7858966.5 Ops/sec |
regex.test | 11328482.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the provided benchmark.
What is tested?
The benchmark tests two different approaches to validate if a string matches a specific regular expression pattern: regex.test()
and regex.exec()
. These functions are part of the JavaScript String prototype, which provides methods for searching and manipulating strings using regular expressions.
Options compared
Two options are being compared:
String.test(string)
: This method tests whether the entire string matches the regular expression pattern.regex.exec(string)
: This function executes the regular expression pattern on the input string and returns an array of match results, if any.Pros and Cons of each approach
String.test(string)
:
Pros:
Cons:
regex.exec(string)
:
Pros:
Cons:
exec()
for each match, which can lead to slower performance compared to test()
.Library used
In this benchmark, no external libraries are used. However, if you're interested in exploring other options, some popular regular expression engines for JavaScript include:
RegExp
: The built-in JavaScript engine for regular expressions.js-regex
: A library that provides additional features and performance optimizations for regular expressions.Special JS feature or syntax
There is no specific JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. Both test()
and exec()
are standard methods of the JavaScript String prototype.
Other alternatives
If you're looking to optimize your code or explore alternative approaches, consider:
js-regex
for improved performance.Keep in mind that these alternatives may require significant changes to your code and are not necessarily more efficient or accurate.