data = [Array(100000)].map((_, id) => ([ id, Math.random() ]))
const res = new Map(data).get(50)
const res = data.find(([ id ]) => id === 50)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array to Map and find | |
Array.find |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array to Map and find | 120.0 Ops/sec |
Array.find | 6637460.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition json and analyze what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures two different approaches for searching an array: Array.find
and converting the array to a map (Array.toMap
) followed by using the get()
method. The goal is to determine which approach is faster in JavaScript.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code generates an array of 100,000 elements, where each element is an object with an id
property and a random value. This creates a large dataset for testing.
Options Compared
Two approaches are being compared:
id
property of each element is equal to 50.Map()
constructor. The map is then used to retrieve the value associated with the key 50
.Pros and Cons
Array.find
for very large datasets, since it uses a hash table lookup that can return results in constant time. This approach also avoids iterating through the entire array.Library and Its Purpose
In this benchmark, no specific libraries are used beyond those provided by JavaScript itself. However, some modern browsers like Chrome provide optimized implementations of these methods, which may affect the results.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. The focus is on comparing two different approaches to searching an array.
Other Alternatives
If you were to add more alternatives, some options might include:
for...of
loops instead of Array.find
Set()
constructor) and using the has()
methodKeep in mind that each alternative would require additional code modifications and may introduce different trade-offs in terms of performance, simplicity, and maintainability.