Benchmark: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance vs access

Tests:

Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject);
Access
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } let finalObject = {} finalObject.someData = firstObject.someData finalObject.moreData = secondObject.moreData

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign
Access

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definitions and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach.

**Benchmark Overview**

The website MeasureThat.net allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The current benchmark compares three ways to merge objects in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`), `Object.assign()`, and accessing object properties directly.

**Individual Test Cases**

1. **Using the Spread Operator**
```javascript
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = {
  ...firstObject,
  ...secondObject
}
```
The spread operator is being tested in this case.

Pros:

* Concise and expressive syntax.
* Can be used to merge objects with any combination of properties, not just the ones already present in one of the source objects.

Cons:

* May not work as expected if the properties are not enumerable or if there are conflicting property names (e.g., `sampleData` in `firstObject` vs. `moreData` in `secondObject`). To fix this, you need to use `Object.assign()` with a custom merge strategy.
* Can be slower than other approaches due to its dynamic nature.

2. **Using Object.assign()**
```javascript
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject)
```
`Object.assign()` is being tested in this case.

Pros:

* Well-established and widely supported method.
* Can handle conflicting property names by overriding the values from one object onto another.

Cons:

* Less concise syntax compared to the spread operator.
* May not work as expected if there are any additional properties on one of the source objects that should be preserved (e.g., `someOtherProperty` in `firstObject`).

3. **Access**
```javascript
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
let finalObject = {}
finalObject.someData = firstObject.sampleData
finalObject.moreData = secondObject.moreData
```
The "Access" test case is being compared against the other two approaches.

Pros:

* Can be faster than other approaches since it uses direct property assignment, which is a simple operation.
* Does not require any additional libraries or modifications to the source code.

Cons:

* Requires more code and can be less readable due to the need to explicitly define and assign each property individually.
* May have performance issues if the number of properties being merged is very large.

**Library Used**

None, as this benchmark uses built-in JavaScript features only.

**Special JS Feature/ Syntax**

The spread operator (`...`) is a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018. It allows you to expand an object into another object, merging their properties.

For those who may not be familiar with the spread operator, here's a brief explanation:

* In JavaScript, when you use the `...` operator followed by an object literal (e.g., `{ ...firstObject }`), it creates a new object that contains all the properties from `firstObject`.
* When used as part of a function call or method invocation (e.g., `[...firstObject]`), it can be used to extract an array of values from an object.

**Alternatives**

If you prefer not to use the spread operator, you can achieve similar results with other methods, such as:

* Using `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj1) + JSON.stringify(obj2))` (not recommended due to performance and security concerns)
* Using a library like Lodash's `merge()` function
* Implementing a custom merge function using loops or recursion

However, for most use cases, the spread operator is a concise and efficient way to merge objects in JavaScript.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/66.0.3359.181 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Safari 537.36 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Using the spread operator	2102736.5 Ops/sec
Using Object.assign	1903698.9 Ops/sec
Access	561848000.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance vs access (version: 0)

test

Comparing performance of: Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign vs Access

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Using the spread operator

Using Object.assign

Access

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):