function test() { console.log(arguments[arguments.length - 1]); }
var using = (new Array(5)).fill(null).map((e, i) => (i));
test(using);
test.apply(null, using)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
spread | |
apply |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
spread | 383633.7 Ops/sec |
apply | 381037.4 Ops/sec |
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case on MeasureThat.net, which compares the performance of two different ways to call a function with arbitrary arguments dynamically: the spread operator (...
) and the apply
method.
What is tested:
test
function is defined in the Script Preparation Code section, which takes an array of arguments using the spread operator.using
variable).spread
: Calls the test
function with the using
array as a single argument using the spread operator (test(...using);
).apply
: Calls the test
function with the using
array as an array of arguments using the apply
method (test.apply(null, using)
).Options compared:
test
function with the using
array.apply
method is used to execute a function with an arbitrary number of arguments. In this case, it's used to call the test
function with the using
array as separate arguments.Pros and Cons of different approaches:
apply
method:Library and Special JS Features:
There is no library mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript does have several libraries and frameworks that provide additional functionality, such as lodash
or Ramda
, which might be used to implement the spread operator or other utility functions.
As for special JavaScript features, there are none explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives:
function test(...using)
.push.apply()
method to pass an array as an argument.apply
method, one could use Function.prototype.call()
to execute a function with an arbitrary number of arguments.These alternatives might be worth considering when optimizing code for performance or readability.