Benchmark: confronto operatore maggiore e diverso

Tests:

op. maggiore
let x = ((Math.random() * 10)) > 5 ? 1 : 0; return (x > 0) ? 1 : 0;
op. diverso
let x = ((Math.random() * 10) > 5) ? 1 : 0; return (x != 0) ? 1 : 0;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
op. maggiore
op. diverso

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
op. maggiore	8320525.5 Ops/sec
op. diverso	8434276.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript expression that uses conditional statements to evaluate a truthy or falsy value. The expression checks if a random number generated between 0 and 10 is greater than 5. If it is, the expression returns 1; otherwise, it returns 0.

There are two variations of this expression:

* `op. maggiore` (greater): This uses the greater-than (`>`) operator to compare the random value with 5.
* `op. diverso` (different): This uses the not equal to (`!=`) operator to check if the random value is different from 5.

**Comparison Options**

The two comparison options are:

1. **Greater Than (`>`)**: This checks if the random value is greater than 5. If true, it returns 1; otherwise, it returns 0.
2. **Not Equal to (`!=`)**: This checks if the random value is not equal to 5. If true, it returns 1; otherwise, it returns 0.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Greater Than (`>`)**:
	+ Pros: Simple and straightforward comparison.
	+ Cons: May be slower due to floating-point arithmetic (in this case, the random number generation).
* **Not Equal to (`!=`)**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster due to the use of a simple integer comparison.
	+ Cons: May return incorrect results if the equality operator is optimized away.

**Library and Special JS Features**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the `Math.random()` function generates a random number between 0 (inclusive) and 1 (exclusive). The expression `(Math.random() * 10)` generates a random number between 0 and 9.

**Other Considerations**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two different comparison operators. However, in practice, these differences are usually negligible unless you're working with extremely large datasets or performance-critical code.

If you want to optimize this benchmark, consider using:

* A more efficient random number generator (e.g., `Math.random()` with a high-quality seed).
* A Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler or other optimization techniques specific to your target JavaScript engine.
* A larger dataset to reduce the impact of measurement noise.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative benchmarks, consider these options:

* Compare different string comparison operators (e.g., `===`, `!==`, `==`, `!=`).
* Evaluate the performance of different numeric operations (e.g., addition, subtraction, multiplication, division).
* Compare the performance of different data structures (e.g., arrays, objects, sets).

Keep in mind that each benchmark has its own set of pros and cons, and the choice of which one to run will depend on your specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

confronto operatore maggiore e diverso (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: op. maggiore vs op. diverso

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

op. maggiore

op. diverso

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):