Benchmark: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Tests:

lodash merge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = _.merge(a, b);
object.assign
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = Object.assign(a, b);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash merge
object.assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/65.0.3325.162 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 65 on Mac OS X 10.12.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash merge	2073472.4 Ops/sec
object.assign	2849517.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the explanation into manageable chunks.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two approaches to merging objects: `Object.assign()` and the spread operator (introduced in ES6). The goal is to determine which method is faster, more efficient, or reliable for object merging.

**Options Compared**

1. **`Object.assign()`**: This method takes multiple arguments (object(s) to be merged into another object) and returns a new object containing all the properties from the input objects.
2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This syntax allows you to merge two or more objects by using the spread operator in an assignment expression, e.g., `const result = { ...a, ...b };`

**Pros and Cons**

1. **`Object.assign()`**:
	* Pros: More widely supported across older browsers (IE 9+), easier to read and write, and works with any number of input objects.
	* Cons: Can be slower than the spread operator due to its overhead in creating a new object.
2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**:
	* Pros: Faster, more concise, and modern syntax that's gaining widespread adoption.
	* Cons: Less supported across older browsers (mostly only Chrome 59+), might not work as expected with certain libraries or frameworks.

**Library Used**

In the provided benchmark code, `lodash` is used in one of the test cases. Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides utility functions for tasks like object merging (`_.merge()`). The use of Lodash here helps ensure consistent results across different browsers and environments.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

The spread operator (introduced in ES6) allows for concise and expressive syntax, making code easier to read and write. However, its usage might be unfamiliar to developers who are not familiar with modern JavaScript features.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need to merge objects without using `Object.assign()` or the spread operator, other alternatives include:

1. **`.concat()`**: Although deprecated in favor of the spread operator, `.concat()` can still be used for merging arrays.
2. **`Array.prototype.reduce()`**: This method can be used to merge objects by reducing them into a single object using a custom callback function.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and readability compared to `Object.assign()` and the spread operator.

I hope this explanation helps!

Related benchmarks:

Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (version: 0)

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method

Comparing performance of: lodash merge vs object.assign

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash merge

object.assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):