Benchmark: appendChild vs append

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="A"></div>
<div id="B">1234</div>

Tests:

appendChild
A.appendChild(B);
append
A.append(B);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
appendChild
append

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between two methods: `appendChild` and `append`. Specifically, it tests how long it takes for these methods to add an HTML element with the text "1234" to a parent element (`div A`) in two different ways:

1. Using the `appendChild` method.
2. Using the `append` method.

**Options being compared**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of two specific JavaScript methods:

* `appendChild`: adds a child element to the end of its parent container.
* `append`: adds an HTML element to the end of a DOM node.

**Pros and Cons**

**AppendChild:**

Pros:

* More widely supported in older browsers, as it's been part of the DOM API since Netscape 4.x.
* Can be used for more complex scenarios where multiple elements need to be added at once.

Cons:

* Generally slower than `append` due to its overhead.
* May require additional configuration or modifications when working with older browsers.

**Append:**

Pros:

* Typically faster than `appendChild`, especially in modern browsers.
* Simplifies the process of adding HTML elements by providing a single, straightforward method.

Cons:

* May not be supported in all browsers (e.g., older versions of Internet Explorer).
* Can lead to more complex code when working with multiple elements or scenarios.

**Library usage**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's likely that the `div A` element and its child (`div B`) are part of a standard HTML structure. If other libraries or frameworks were used in the test code, they would need to be explicitly mentioned for accurate interpretation.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

The benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the two methods being compared: `appendChild` and `append`. There's no mention of ES6+ syntax, promises, async/await, or other advanced features.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for testing performance differences between DOM manipulation methods might include:

* Using a virtual DOM library like React or Vue.js to compare rendering performance.
* Employing a graph-based approach to visualize the execution paths and identify performance bottlenecks.
* Utilizing a benchmarking framework specifically designed for JavaScript, such as BenchmarkJS or MicroBenchmark.

Keep in mind that the specific use case and desired outcome will dictate the most suitable alternatives.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 123 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
appendChild	167372.6 Ops/sec
append	149563.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

appendChild vs append (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: appendChild vs append

Created: 9 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

appendChild

append

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):