Benchmark: index vs lastindexof for Array

Tests:

lastIndexOf
var str = "Hello world, welcome to the universe.".split(' ');; var n = str.lastIndexOf("welcome");
indexOf
var str = "Hello world, welcome to the universe.".split(' '); var n = str.indexOf("welcome");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lastIndexOf
indexOf

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Definition**
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two methods: `lastIndexOf` and `indexOf` on arrays in JavaScript.

**What are being compared?**

* `lastIndexOf`: This method returns the highest index of a specified value within an array. If the value is not found, -1 is returned.
* `indexOf`: This method returns the index of the first occurrence of a specified value within an array. If the value is not found, -1 is returned.

**Options being compared**

The benchmark compares two options:

A) Using `lastIndexOf` on a string that has already been split into an array of words (split by spaces).

B) Using `indexOf` on a string that has already been split into an array of words (split by spaces).

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Using `lastIndexOf`:**
	+ Pros:
		- Can be faster for large arrays because it doesn't have to search from the beginning of the array.
		- Can handle edge cases where the value is at the end of the array more efficiently.
	+ Cons:
		- May be slower than `indexOf` when searching for a specific word within a short array.
		- Returns the highest index, which might not always be what you want (e.g., if there are multiple occurrences).
* **Using `indexOf`:**
	+ Pros:
		- Faster and more efficient for small arrays or when searching for a specific word.
		- Returns the exact index of the first occurrence, making it easier to work with.
	+ Cons:
		- May be slower than `lastIndexOf` for large arrays because it has to search from the beginning of the array.

**Library used:**

None explicitly mentioned. However, it's likely that a default JavaScript implementation is being used.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

The benchmark uses the `split()` method, which splits a string into an array of words (split by spaces). This is a built-in JavaScript method that doesn't require any external libraries or dependencies.

**Other alternatives:**

If you wanted to test these methods with different scenarios or options, you might consider adding more benchmarks, such as:

* Using `lastIndexOf` and `indexOf` on arrays with duplicate values.
* Testing performance with arrays of different sizes (small, medium, large).
* Adding a timeout or timeout option to see how the browsers handle slow or failing tests.

Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on your specific use case and requirements.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lastIndexOf	24849016.0 Ops/sec
indexOf	20801142.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

index vs lastindexof for Array (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lastIndexOf vs indexOf

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lastIndexOf

indexOf

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):