<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/emn178/js-md5/build/md5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/crypto-js/4.1.1/crypto-js.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/crypto-js/4.1.1/md5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/spark-md5/3.0.2/spark-md5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hash-wasm"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joseph-md5/joseph-md5@dd8a9eb1575f294abfcf79106007c90fffab8c72/joseph-md5.js"></script>
var str = 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog';
md5(str);
CryptoJS.MD5(str).toString();
SparkMD5.hash(str);
hashwasm.md5(str);
josephMD5(str);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
js-md5 | |
CryptoJS | |
SparkMD5 | |
Hash-WASM | |
joseph-md5 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
js-md5 | 3105418.2 Ops/sec |
CryptoJS | 330121.3 Ops/sec |
SparkMD5 | 1278420.2 Ops/sec |
Hash-WASM | 794839.7 Ops/sec |
joseph-md5 | 841460.2 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark compares the performance of five different MD5 hash algorithms implemented in JavaScript: js-md5, CryptoJS, SparkMD5, Hash-WASM, and joseph-md5. The benchmark aims to determine which algorithm is the fastest and most efficient.
Algorithm Options Compared
Pros and Cons
Library and Syntax Features
Special JS Features
None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines, like V8 (used by Chrome and Node.js), have built-in support for WebAssembly and provide optimized performance for WASM-based libraries.
Alternatives
In summary, the benchmark compares five different JavaScript MD5 implementations, each with its strengths and weaknesses. The choice of algorithm depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and desired level of security.