this.number = Math.random() * 1000;
return ~~this.number;
return this.number | 0;
return Math.floor(this.number);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
~~ | |
| | |
floor |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
~~ | 1438144256.0 Ops/sec |
| | 1436363008.0 Ops/sec |
floor | 9419157.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark is designed to compare three different approaches for achieving the same mathematical result:
Options Comparison:
The pros and cons of each approach are:
Libraries and Special JS Features:
None of the test cases rely on any external libraries beyond JavaScript's built-in functionality, which is sufficient for this benchmark.
There are no special JavaScript features being tested in these benchmarks. However, it's worth noting that some older browsers might have issues with bitwise operations or signed shifts due to their implementation details.
Other Alternatives:
If you want to explore alternative approaches for rounding numbers in JavaScript, consider the following options:
lodash
's floor
functionNumber.EPSILON
constant to determine the smallest representable value in floating-point arithmeticKeep in mind that these alternatives might introduce performance overhead, memory usage, or dependencies on external libraries. Always profile and test your code to ensure it meets your requirements.
For this benchmark specifically, the focus is on comparing the efficiency of different rounding approaches within JavaScript's built-in capabilities.