var items = [];
var items = new Array();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
notacion corchetes | |
Array |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
notacion corchetes | 51532196.0 Ops/sec |
Array | 2593318.2 Ops/sec |
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark measures the performance of two different ways to create an empty array in JavaScript: using square brackets ([]
) and the Array
constructor.
Options compared
There are two options compared:
[]
): This is the most common way to create an empty array in modern JavaScript.Array
constructor: This method creates a new, empty array using the Array
constructor.Pros and Cons of each approach
Square Brackets ([]
)
Pros:
Cons: None notable, but may lead to confusion for some developers who are not familiar with this syntax.
Array
constructor
Pros:
Cons:
Other considerations
When working with arrays, it's essential to consider the implications of using new Array()
instead of square brackets. For example, if you're planning to push elements onto the array later, using []
can lead to better performance.
Library usage
None of the benchmark scripts use any external libraries.
Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two simple array creation methods.
Alternatives
Other alternatives for creating empty arrays include:
Array.from([])
(although slower due to the overhead of the function call)[] instanceof Array
(not a recommended approach, as it's less readable and can lead to performance issues)Keep in mind that these alternative approaches are not typically used in production code, and the benchmark is focused on comparing two specific methods: square brackets ([]
) and the Array
constructor.
In summary, this benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance of different array creation methods in modern JavaScript, allowing developers to make informed decisions when working with arrays.