function createDateArrayInAMonth(year, month) {
return [new Array(new Date(year, month, 0).getDate())].map((_, i) => new Date(year, month - 1, i + 1).toLocaleString())
}
createDateArrayInAMonth(2023, 10)
function createDateArrayInAMonth(year, month) {
return Array.apply(null, new Array(new Date(year, month, 0).getDate())).map((_, i) => new Date(year, month - 1, i + 1).toLocaleString())
}
createDateArrayInAMonth(2023, 10)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array Spread | |
Array Apply |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array Spread | 14567.2 Ops/sec |
Array Apply | 14711.6 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
The provided JSON represents a benchmark comparison between two approaches: Array.apply()
and Array spread
(also known as the spread operator ...
). The benchmark is designed to test which approach is faster for creating an array of dates within a specific month.
What is being tested?
In this benchmark, we have two test cases:
Array Apply
: This approach uses the Array.apply()
method to create an array with a specified length. In this case, the length is determined by the number of days in the specified month.Array Spread
: This approach uses the spread operator (...
) to create an array from an existing array. In this case, we use new Array(new Date(year, month, 0).getDate())
as the source array.Options compared
The two approaches are being compared in terms of execution speed (measured in executions per second).
Pros and Cons of each approach:
apply()
can only be called on objects that have the apply()
method, which can lead to errors if not handled properly.Library usage
In this benchmark, there are no libraries used beyond the built-in JavaScript features (e.g., Date
).
Special JS feature or syntax
The test cases use ES6 syntax, specifically:
...
) in the Array spread
approach.\r\n...\r\n
) for formatting the code.Other considerations
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the trade-offs between readability and performance. If you prioritize conciseness and modernity, the Array spread
approach might be a better choice. However, if you prefer to explicitly state the intention of creating an array with a specific length, Array.apply()
might be a more readable option.
As for alternatives, other approaches could include:
Array.from()
, which creates a new array from an iterable.reduce()
or another array method to create the desired array structure.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches can be significant, especially when working with large datasets.