Benchmark: test js - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/zepto/1.2.0/zepto.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/umbrella/2.10.1/umbrella.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/blissfuljs/1.0.3/bliss.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Tests:

jquery1
var text = jQuery("#foo").text();
jquery2
var text = jQuery("#foo").html();
jquery3
var text = jQuery("#foo");
umbrella1
var text = u("#foo");
umbrella2
var text = u("#foo").text();
umbrella3
var text = u("#foo").html();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
jquery1
jquery2
jquery3
umbrella1
umbrella2
umbrella3

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of JavaScript code can be a complex task, as it involves various factors such as browser support, caching, and optimization. Let's break down what is tested in the provided benchmark.

**Benchmarked libraries**

The benchmark uses four JavaScript libraries:

1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX.
2. **Zepto**: Another lightweight JavaScript library for DOM manipulation, similar to jQuery but with a smaller footprint.
3. **Umbrella**: A high-performance JavaScript framework that aims to provide a balance between features and performance.
4. **BlissfulJS**: A modern JavaScript library for building scalable web applications.

**Tested methods**

The benchmark tests the execution time of different methods in each library:

1. `jQuery("#foo").text();`: Retrieves the text content of an element with the id "foo" using jQuery's `text()` method.
2. `jQuery("#foo").html();`: Retrieves the HTML content of an element with the id "foo" using jQuery's `html()` method.
3. `jQuery("#foo");`: Returns a jQuery object representing the element with the id "foo".
4. `u("#foo");`: Calls the `u` function from the Umbrella library, which is likely used for DOM manipulation and event handling.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares the execution time of each method in different libraries:

* `jQuery` vs. `Zepto`
* `jQuery` vs. `Umbrella`
* `Umbrella` vs. `BlissfulJS`

**Pros and cons of each approach**

1. ** jQuery**
	* Pros: Widespread support, large community, and a rich set of features.
	* Cons: Can be slow and bloated due to its size and complexity.
2. **Zepto**
	* Pros: Lightweight, fast, and compatible with older browsers.
	* Cons: Smaller community compared to jQuery, and fewer features.
3. **Umbrella**
	* Pros: High-performance architecture, flexible and customizable.
	* Cons: Smaller community compared to other libraries, and may require more expertise to use effectively.
4. **BlissfulJS**
	* Pros: Modern design, high-performance capabilities, and a growing community.
	* Cons: Still a relatively new library, with fewer resources and documentation available.

**Other considerations**

1. **Browser support**: The benchmark results are specific to the Firefox 59 browser on Windows 10. Other browsers may behave differently or have varying levels of support for these libraries.
2. **Cacheability**: The performance results may be influenced by caching mechanisms in the browser, which can affect the execution time of repeated tests.
3. **Optimization techniques**: Libraries and frameworks often employ various optimization techniques, such as tree shaking or code splitting, to reduce bundle sizes and improve performance.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to these libraries, consider:

1. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a wide range of functions for data manipulation and other tasks.
2. **React**: A JavaScript library for building user interfaces and managing state changes.
3. **Vue.js**: Another popular JavaScript framework for building web applications.
4. **Preact**: A lightweight alternative to React, designed for performance-critical applications.

In conclusion, the benchmark provides valuable insights into the relative performance of different libraries and methods in the context of a specific use case. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions about which libraries to use for their projects.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 59 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
jquery1	1314710.6 Ops/sec
jquery2	1004934.5 Ops/sec
jquery3	2101426.0 Ops/sec
umbrella1	303641.1 Ops/sec
umbrella2	299445.1 Ops/sec
umbrella3	295591.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

test js (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: jquery1 vs jquery2 vs jquery3 vs umbrella1 vs umbrella2 vs umbrella3

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

jquery1

jquery2

jquery3

umbrella1

umbrella2

umbrella3

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):