var strings = [
'bbbb',
'AAbb',
'aaBB',
'AAbb11',
'aaBB11',
'11aaBB',
'aaAAbb',
'aaaa'
];
const matches = strings.filter(s => /^(?=.*[A-Za-z])(?=.*\d)[A-Za-z\d$@!%*#?&-_]{4,14}$/.test(s));
if (matches.length !== 3) {
throw 'invalid number of matches: ' + matches;
}
const matches = strings.filter(s => {
return /^[\w$@!%*#?&-]{4,14}$/.test(s) &&
/[A-Z]/.test(s) &&
/[a-z]/.test(s) &&
/[0-9]/.test(s);
});
if (matches.length !== 3) {
throw 'invalid number of matches: ' + matches;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
regexp | |
many regexps |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
regexp | 574183.2 Ops/sec |
many regexps | 295866.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition json contains two separate benchmarks: regexp
and many regexps
. These benchmarks are designed to test the performance of different approaches to match strings against regular expressions.
Options Compared
In the regexp
benchmark:
/g
flag, which allows the engine to find all matches in the string./g
flag.In the many regexps
benchmark:
/g
flag./g
flag.Pros and Cons
The choice between these options depends on the trade-off between speed, memory usage, and complexity. Here are some general pros and cons of each approach:
/g
:/g
:Library Used
In both benchmarks, a filter function is used to process the strings
array. This suggests that the benchmark is testing the performance of JavaScript's built-in filter()
method in conjunction with regular expressions.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The tests are purely focused on the performance of different approaches to match strings against regular expressions.
Other Considerations
The benchmarks also include information about the device platform, operating system, and browser used to run the tests. This suggests that the results may be influenced by factors such as hardware acceleration or software optimizations.
Alternative Approaches
Some alternative approaches to this benchmark could include:
re
module.Overall, this benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance characteristics of JavaScript's built-in filter()
method and its interaction with regular expressions.