var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var b = new Set(a)
a.indexOf(7);
b.has(7);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array | |
set |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array | 59248796.0 Ops/sec |
set | 112207488.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided JavaScript microbenchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using an array (indexOf
) and using a Set
data structure (has
) to check if a specific value exists. The benchmark compares the execution time of these two approaches for searching for a specific element within each data structure.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
indexOf()
: This method searches for the specified value in the array and returns its index if found, or -1 if not found.has()
: This method checks if the specified value is present in the set.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
indexOf()
:has()
:Library and Its Purpose
In the provided benchmark, the Set
library is used to create a set data structure (b
) from an array (a
). The Set
object provides methods like has()
for checking if a value is present in the set. The purpose of using a Set
here is to demonstrate its performance advantages over array-based searching.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The benchmark uses JavaScript's built-in Set
data structure, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This feature allows for efficient and compact storage of unique values. The has()
method is a part of the Set
prototype and provides a fast way to check if a value is present in the set.
Other Alternatives
Besides using an array (indexOf
) or a Set
(has
), other alternatives for searching for a specific element within an array or set include:
Array.prototype.includes()
(introduced in ECMAScript 2015, ES6) instead of indexOf()
.However, these alternatives may not be as widely supported or efficient as the built-in Set
and has()
methods.