<script src="https://unpkg.com/dayjs@1.8.21/dayjs.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://igor.moomers.org/random/datefns.js"></script>
window.ds = new Date("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00");
window.datefns.startOfWeek(window.ds);
dayjs(ds)
dayjs().startOf("week")
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Date-fns | |
Dayjs |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Date-fns | 3260995.8 Ops/sec |
Dayjs | 2010121.5 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the JavaScript benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark compares the performance of two libraries: Day.js and Date-fns, specifically when it comes to formatting dates. The benchmark measures how many date format operations can be executed per second in each library.
Library Descriptions
Comparison Options
The benchmark compares the performance of Day.js and Date-fns when executing two different date format operations:
datefns.startOfWeek(date)
dayjs(date).startOf("week")
These operations both take a date object as input and return a new date object representing the start of the week.
Pros and Cons
Special JS Feature/ Syntax
In this benchmark, neither library uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would affect performance. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of the two libraries.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative date libraries, some popular options include:
These libraries offer different strengths and weaknesses, and may be more suitable depending on your specific use case.
In summary, the Day.js and Date-fns benchmark compares the performance of two popular JavaScript date libraries when executing common date format operations. The results can help developers choose between these libraries based on their specific needs and performance requirements.